Literature DB >> 14645193

LH serum levels during ovarian stimulation as predictors of ovarian response and assisted reproduction outcome in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH.

Joana Peñarrubia1, Francisco Fábregues, Montserrat Creus, Dolors Manau, Roser Casamitjana, Marta Guimerá, Francisco Carmona, Juan A Vanrell, Juan Balasch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been much debate about the effect of 'residual' LH levels in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction with GnRH agonist down-regulation and recombinant FSH ovarian stimulation. The aim of this prospective study, where receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used, was to assess further the usefulness of serum LH levels as predictors of ovarian response, assisted reproduction treatment outcome, and the outcome of pregnancy when measured throughout the ovarian stimulation period in a large cohort of such assisted reproduction treatment women.
METHODS: A total of 246 consecutive women undergoing their first cycle of IVF or ICSI treatment were included in this study. Blood samples for hormone analyses were obtained on day S0 (the day when pituitary suppression was evidenced) and every other day from stimulation day 5 (S5) until the day of hCG injection.
RESULTS: LH serum levels throughout ovarian stimulation treatment were similar for cancelled (n =32) versus non-cancelled (n = 214) cycles, non-conception (n = 132) versus conception (n = 82) cycles, and ongoing pregnancy (n = 66) versus early pregnancy loss (n = 16) groups. There was no correlation between LH serum levels in non-cancelled cycles and parameters of ovarian response and assisted reproduction treatment outcome. ROC analysis showed that serum LH concentration during ovarian stimulation was unable to discriminate between cancelled and non-cancelled cycles, conception versus non-conception cycles, or early pregnancy loss versus ongoing pregnancy groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Serum LH measurements during ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment cannot predict ovarian response, IVF/ICSI outcome, implantation, and the outcome of pregnancy. Thus, there is little underlying physiological support for the addition of LH in stimulation protocols if daily doses of an appropriate GnRH agonist (leuprolide or triptorelin having lower potency than buserelin) and a step-down regimen of recombinant FSH administration are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14645193     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of embryological and clinical outcome in GnRH antagonist vs. GnRH agonist protocols for in vitro fertilization in PCOS non-obese patients. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Rafal Kurzawa; Przemyslaw Ciepiela; Tomasz Baczkowski; Krzysztof Safranow; Pawel Brelik
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Elevated day 3 FSH/LH ratio: a marker to predict IVF outcome in young and older women.

Authors:  Berna Seckin; Figen Turkcapar; Gulnur Ozaksit
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Differences in serum LH and FSH levels using depot or daily GnRH agonists in controlled ovarian stimulation: influence on ovarian response and outcome of ART.

Authors:  Barbara Sonntag; Ludwig Kiesel; Eberhard Nieschlag; Hermann M Behre
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  A cohort study of both human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and recombinant luteinizing hormone addition at early follicular stage in in vitro fertilization outcome: A STROBE-compliant study.

Authors:  Xi Xia; Yu Shi; Lan Geng; Dan Liu; Zhenhui Hou; Hongbo Lin; Rong Li; Haiyan Wang; Liyuan Tao; Fanhua Meng; Jian Da; Yun Chen; Jie Qiao; Weiping Qian; Hongzhen Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Oxidative stress and DNA damage status in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment.

Authors:  Iman Al-Saleh; Serdar Coskun; Reem Al-Rouqi; Tahreer Al-Rajudi; Chafica Eltabache; Mai Abduljabbar; Saad Al-Hassan
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2021-05-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.