Literature DB >> 14645020

Quantitative analysis of sponsorship bias in economic studies of antidepressants.

C Bruce Baker1, Michael T Johnsrud, M Lynn Crismon, Robert A Rosenheck, Scott W Woods.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concern is widespread about potential sponsorship influence on research, especially in pharmacoeconomic studies. Quantitative analysis of possible bias in such studies is limited. AIMS: To determine whether there is an association between sponsorship and quantitative outcomes in pharmacoeconomic studies of antidepressants.
METHOD: Using all identifiable articles with original comparative quantitative cost or cost-effectiveness outcomes for antidepressants, we performed contingency table analyses of study sponsorship and design v. study outcome.
RESULTS: Studies sponsored by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) manufacturers favoured SSRIs over tricyclic antidepressants more than non-industry-sponsored studies. Studies sponsored by manufacturers of newer antidepressants favoured these drugs more than did non-industry-sponsored studies. Among industry-sponsored studies, modelling studies favoured the sponsor's drug more than did administrative studies. Industry-sponsored modelling studies were more favourable to industry than were non-industry-sponsored ones.
CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacoeconomic studies of antidepressants reveal clear associations of study sponsorship with quantitative outcome.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14645020     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.183.6.498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  43 in total

Review 1.  Modelling the cost effectiveness of treatments for Parkinson's disease: a methodological review.

Authors:  Judith Dams; Bernhard Bornschein; Jens Peter Reese; Annette Conrads-Frank; Wolfgang H Oertel; Uwe Siebert; Richard Dodel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Of mugs, meals and more: the intricate relations between physicians and the medical industry.

Authors:  Stephan Sahm
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-05

3.  Medical reversal: why we must raise the bar before adopting new technologies.

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Adam Cifu
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2011-12

4.  The financing of drug trials by pharmaceutical companies and its consequences. Part 1: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature on possible influences on the findings, protocols, and quality of drug trials.

Authors:  Gisela Schott; Henry Pachl; Ulrich Limbach; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Klaus Lieb
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Differences in the Selection of Health State Utility Values by Sponsorship in Published Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.

Authors:  Nathaniel Hendrix; David D Kim; Krishna S Patel; Beth Devine
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  Evidence-based ethics for neurology and psychiatry research.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-07

Review 7.  Evidence from cost-effectiveness research.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; Robert G Holloway
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-07

8.  Pramipexole and levodopa in early Parkinson's disease: dynamic changes in cost effectiveness.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; Andrew W Dick; Robert G Holloway
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  A review of health care models for coronary heart disease interventions.

Authors:  K Cooper; S C Brailsford; R Davies; J Raftery
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2006-11

10.  Transparency in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Suzanne Hill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.