Literature DB >> 14643957

Quantitative assessment of inter-clinician variability of target volume delineation for medulloblastoma: quality assurance for the SIOP PNET 4 trial protocol.

Charlotte E Coles1, Andrew C F Hoole, Susan V Harden, Neil G Burnet, Nicola Twyman, Roger E Taylor, Rolf D Kortmann, Michael V Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To assess inter-clinician variability amongst specialist paediatric radiation oncologists in delineating clinical target volumes for treating medulloblastoma as a quality assurance exercise prior to the introduction of the SIOP PNET 4 trial protocol of conformal radiotherapy to the posterior fossa and tumour bed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants from 17 UK centres attended an educational meeting and then completed a clinical planning exercise to outline: (1) the whole posterior fossa and (2) the tumour bed. Quantitative analysis of the volumes, lengths, spatial positioning and axial planes for each individual was carried out and variation between individuals analysed.
RESULTS: Outlining of the posterior fossa was reasonably consistent, although most variation was seen in defining the superior border of the tentorium. A major difference was the decision whether or not to include the post-surgical meningocoele in the clinical target volume (CTV). The CTV for the tumour bed was under treated by all participants due to lack of inclusion of pre-operative tumour extent.
CONCLUSIONS: This exercise demonstrated several ambiguities in the draft protocol and highlighted particular areas of inter-clinician variation. Consequently the protocol was revised and improved to take account of these findings. We recommend that planning exercises, in conjunction with education and training, should be implemented before the start of any new radiotherapy trial. In the future, the use of image transfer will allow prospective peer review of target volumes before treatment commences. These measures are essential to ensure that alterations in clinical practice are achieved in a uniform way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14643957     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2003.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  7 in total

1.  Appraisal of the current staging system for residual medulloblastoma by volumetric analysis.

Authors:  Dimitris Kombogiorgas; Stephanie Puget; Nathalie Boddaert; Andrew Peet; Martin English; Kal Natarajan; Jacques Grill; Dominique Couanet; Christian Sainte-Rose; Spyros Sgouros
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Improving radiotherapy quality assurance in clinical trials: assessment of target volume delineation of the pre-accrual benchmark case.

Authors:  S Gwynne; E Spezi; D Sebag-Montefiore; S Mukherjee; E Miles; J Conibear; J Staffurth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Prospective randomized double-blind pilot study of site-specific consensus atlas implementation for rectal cancer target volume delineation in the cooperative group setting.

Authors:  Clifton D Fuller; Jasper Nijkamp; Joop C Duppen; Coen R N Rasch; Charles R Thomas; Samuel J Wang; Paul Okunieff; William E Jones; Daniel Baseman; Shilpen Patel; Carlo G N Demandante; Anna M Harris; Benjamin D Smith; Alan W Katz; Camille McGann; Jennifer L Harper; Daniel T Chang; Stephen Smalley; David T Marshall; Karyn A Goodman; Niko Papanikolaou; Lisa A Kachnic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Feasibility of synthetic computed tomography generated with an adversarial network for multi-sequence magnetic resonance-based brain radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yuhei Koike; Yuichi Akino; Iori Sumida; Hiroya Shiomi; Hirokazu Mizuno; Masashi Yagi; Fumiaki Isohashi; Yuji Seo; Osamu Suzuki; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Delineation in thoracic oncology: a prospective study of the effect of training on contour variability and dosimetric consequences.

Authors:  Sylvain Dewas; Jean-Emmanuel Bibault; Pierre Blanchard; Claire Vautravers-Dewas; Yoann Pointreau; Fabrice Denis; Michel Brauner; Philippe Giraud
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  A dose based approach for evaluation of inter-observer variations in target delineation.

Authors:  Ingrid Kristensen; Kristina Nilsson; Måns Agrup; Karin Belfrage; Anna Embring; Hedda Haugen; Anna-Maja Svärd; Tommy Knöös; Per Nilsson
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-04

7.  Types of deviation and review criteria in pretreatment central quality control of tumor bed boost in medulloblastoma-an analysis of the German Radiotherapy Quality Control Panel in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial.

Authors:  Stefan Dietzsch; Annett Braesigk; Clemens Seidel; Julia Remmele; Ralf Kitzing; Tina Schlender; Martin Mynarek; Dirk Geismar; Karolina Jablonska; Rudolf Schwarz; Montserrat Pazos; Damien C Weber; Silke Frick; Kristin Gurtner; Christiane Matuschek; Semi Ben Harrabi; Albrecht Glück; Victor Lewitzki; Karin Dieckmann; Martin Benesch; Nicolas U Gerber; Denise Obrecht; Stefan Rutkowski; Beate Timmermann; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.621

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.