BACKGROUND: Several reports have suggested that plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are elevated in hypertensive patients especially with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. However, few data have been available concerning the utility of plasma BNP measurement to identify LV hypertrophy in hypertensive patients in a general population screening context. METHODS: We measured plasma BNP concentrations in 1112 volunteers in a health screening program (mean age, 57 years). All subjects underwent electrocardiography, chest X-ray, and echocardiography. Among the sample, 284 subjects were designated as hypertensive because they were on antihypertensive drugs or showed elevated systemic blood pressure. By echocardiography, 36 of the hypertensive patients showed significant LV hypertrophy. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age and sex between the LV hypertrophy and non-LV hypertrophy groups. Plasma BNP levels in the LV hypertrophy group were significantly higher than in the non-LV hypertrophy group (19.4 +/- 18.9 v 28.2 +/- 28.2 pg/mL; P <.05). However, the ability of plasma BNP levels to discriminate between LV hypertrophy and non-LV hypertrophy patients was not sufficient as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.588 (95% CI: 0.528-0.646) with sensitivity of 50.0% and specificity of 69.0%. Positive and negative predictive values for detecting LV hypertrophy among hypertensive patients were 18.9% and 90.5%, respectively. This ability did not improve significantly when the screening was limited to patients with untreated LV hypertrophy or concentric LV hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma BNP testing in a mass screening setting is of limited use for the identification of LV hypertrophy patients among hypertensive patients with heterogeneous etiology.
BACKGROUND: Several reports have suggested that plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are elevated in hypertensivepatients especially with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. However, few data have been available concerning the utility of plasma BNP measurement to identify LV hypertrophy in hypertensivepatients in a general population screening context. METHODS: We measured plasma BNP concentrations in 1112 volunteers in a health screening program (mean age, 57 years). All subjects underwent electrocardiography, chest X-ray, and echocardiography. Among the sample, 284 subjects were designated as hypertensive because they were on antihypertensive drugs or showed elevated systemic blood pressure. By echocardiography, 36 of the hypertensivepatients showed significant LV hypertrophy. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age and sex between the LV hypertrophy and non-LV hypertrophy groups. Plasma BNP levels in the LV hypertrophy group were significantly higher than in the non-LV hypertrophy group (19.4 +/- 18.9 v 28.2 +/- 28.2 pg/mL; P <.05). However, the ability of plasma BNP levels to discriminate between LV hypertrophy and non-LV hypertrophypatients was not sufficient as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.588 (95% CI: 0.528-0.646) with sensitivity of 50.0% and specificity of 69.0%. Positive and negative predictive values for detecting LV hypertrophy among hypertensivepatients were 18.9% and 90.5%, respectively. This ability did not improve significantly when the screening was limited to patients with untreated LV hypertrophy or concentric LV hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma BNP testing in a mass screening setting is of limited use for the identification of LV hypertrophypatients among hypertensivepatients with heterogeneous etiology.
Authors: Daniel H Katz; Rahul C Deo; Frank G Aguilar; Senthil Selvaraj; Eva E Martinez; Lauren Beussink-Nelson; Kwang-Youn A Kim; Jie Peng; Marguerite R Irvin; Hemant Tiwari; D C Rao; Donna K Arnett; Sanjiv J Shah Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Begoña Quintana-Villamandos; Irene González Del Pozo; Laia Pazó-Sayós; Jose María Bellón; Álvaro Pedraz-Prieto; Ángel G Pinto; Emilio Delgado-Baeza Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 3.240