Literature DB >> 1464283

Defining lead as the premiere environmental health issue for children in America: criteria and their quantitative application.

P Mushak1.   

Abstract

The principal environmental health issue for American children is pervasive lead poisoning from the many decades of lead contamination. Available scientific evidence cementing lead's premiere ranking is voluminous, multifaceted, and compelling. This evidence, however, requires organization into a clear and coherent body of science before it can be fully recognized or comprehended by either the scientific community or the general public and its representatives: public health officials, regulators, policy makers, and legislators. An attempt at such organization is presented and begins with the premise that there exist clear, objective criteria by which a premiere environmental health issue can be defined. A second premise is that these criteria sort themselves into three categories which cover the full spectrum of toxic contaminant-population relationships. They are: (1) economic and sociopolitical, (2) scientific and public health, and (3) societal risk assessment criteria. The first set of criteria includes economic and historical centrality, primacy of economic over public health considerations, a relatively narrow decision-making framework, and controlled flow of information on the toxicant, especially its negative impacts. The second set of criteria is also orthodox in scope: the toxicant should be indestructible, should accumulate in both the environment and the body, and should be a multimedia contaminant; it should produce toxicity in numerous organs with little impediment; toxicity should be produced with low/no threshold in huge numbers of the most vulnerable; and finally, effects should persist in the critical target organ(s). There is a third, more globally encompassing, set of criteria important for present-day requirements for risk assessment; e.g., the contaminant should produce full-spectrum population-wide as well as individual toxicity. Evidence for societal harm should be compelling. It should typify the increasing importance of the elements of preventive over clinical medicine and the substance should bring to bear the cost-benefit analysis of macro plus micro health risk. Lead exposure and toxicity is conclusively shown to meet ALL of these criteria and is the premiere environmental health threat to America's children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1464283     DOI: 10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80036-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  16 in total

1.  Analysis of lead in soils adjacent to an interstate highway in Tampa, Florida.

Authors:  M R Hafen; R Brinkmann
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Prenatal or lactational exposure of male rats to lead acetate. Effect on reproductive function.

Authors:  A Thoreux-Manlay; G Pinon-Lataillade; H Coffigny; J C Soufir; R Masse
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Bone lead content assessed by L-line x-ray fluorescence in lead-exposed and non-lead-exposed suburban populations in the United States.

Authors:  J F Rosen; A F Crocetti; K Balbi; J Balbi; C Bailey; I Clemente; N Redkey; S Grainger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Results from a lay health advisor intervention to prevent lead poisoning among rural Native American children.

Authors:  Michelle Crozier Kegler; Lorraine Halinka Malcoe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Geographic analysis of blood lead levels in New York State children born 1994-1997.

Authors:  Valerie B Haley; Thomas O Talbot
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Lead sources, behaviors, and socioeconomic factors in relation to blood lead of native american and white children: a community-based assessment of a former mining area.

Authors:  Lorraine Halinka Malcoe; Robert A Lynch; Michelle Crozier Keger; Valerie J Skaggs
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Demographic risk factors associated with elevated lead levels in Texas children covered by Medicaid.

Authors:  D Kurtin; B L Therrell; P Patterson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Renal effects of environmental and occupational lead exposure.

Authors:  M Loghman-Adham
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Neurotoxicity of lead, methylmercury, and PCBs in relation to the Great Lakes.

Authors:  D C Rice
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  An age-specific kinetic model of lead metabolism in humans.

Authors:  R W Leggett
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.