Literature DB >> 14642044

Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: a single-team experience of 100 cases.

Mani Menon1, Alok Shrivastava, Richard Sarle, Ashok Hemal, Ashutosh Tewari.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the outcomes of the first 100 patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy by a single surgical team. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 2001 to May 2002, we performed robotic radical prostatectomy in 100 patients with localized prostate cancer. The mean age was 60 +/- 0.67 years (SEM), the body mass index 27.5 +/- 0.35, the preoperative prostate specific antigen concentration 7.2 +/- 0.86 ng/mL, and follow-up 5.5 +/- 0.24 months. Thirty-eight patients also underwent pelvic lymph node dissection. We used the da Vinci surgical system and a subperitoneal approach (the Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy; VIP). This is a prospective outcomes analysis of these patients.
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 195 +/- 5.0 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 149 +/- 11.8 mL. No patient required blood transfusion. The stages of the cancers were pT(2a) in 21, pT(2b) in 64, pT(3a) in 5, pT(3b) in 9, and pT(3b)N(1) in 1. The positive surgical margin rate was 15%. At 1, 3, and 6 months, the continence rates were 37%, 72%, and 92%, respectively, and the potency rates were 11%, 32%, and 59%.
CONCLUSION: The VIP is a safe operation with excellent operative parameters, low morbidity, and good surgical margins. The early functional results are promising.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14642044     DOI: 10.1089/089277903770802380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  20 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Authors:  J B Basillote; T E Ahlering; D W Skarecky; D I Lee; R V Clayman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients.

Authors:  L Goeman; L Salomon; A La De Taille; D Vordos; A Hoznek; R Yiou; C C Abbou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 4.  [Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: update 2008].

Authors:  H John
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Benjamin J Challacombe; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Developing technical expertise in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in a moderate-volume center through a proctor-based team approach.

Authors:  Shieh Ling Bang; Keng Siang Png; Yu Yi Yeow; Gerald Yau Min Tan; Yew Lam Chong
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-04-20

7.  The effect of body characteristics on mean operative times while experiencing the learning curve for robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew J Resnick; David I Lee
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-03-24

Review 8.  The role of surgical simulation and the learning curve in robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Reem Al Bareeq; Shiva Jayaraman; Bob Kiaii; Christopher Schlachta; John D Denstedt; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-03-29

9.  Complications of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Boris Fischer; Nadja Engel; Jean-Luc Fehr; Hubert John
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Technical advances in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ryan Turpen; Hany Atalah; Li-Ming Su
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.