Literature DB >> 14641316

Comparative anatomical study of the anterior and posterior mediastinum as access routes after esophagectomy.

R P Coral1, M Constant-Neto, I S Silva, A N Kalil, R Boose, T Beduschi, T F Gemelle.   

Abstract

Esophagectomy is the main option for treatment of esophageal cancer. Among the subjects of surgical interest is the use of anterior versus posterior mediastinum to permit reconstruction of the alimentary tract. We performed postmortem measurements in order to analyze the lengths of both routes. For each route (anterior and posterior) we performed two measurements. The first one was called anatomical route and the second was named as surgical route. Both routes begin at the cricoid cartilage. The anatomical route goes to the celiac axis and the surgical route goes to the gastroduodenal artery. Our results show that in both routes the posterior mediastinum is a shorter way to reach the cervical region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14641316     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2003.00335.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the short-term health-related quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer with different routes of gastric tube reconstruction after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Lijie Tan; Mingxiang Feng; Yi Zhang; Qun Wang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up: the effect of the route of reconstruction.

Authors:  Iraklis E Katsoulis; Ioannis Robotis; Grigorios Kouraklis; Panagiotis Yannopoulos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Anatomically based comparison of the different transthoracic routes for colon ascension after total esogastrectomy.

Authors:  Manuela Perez; Thierry Haumont; Jean Michel Arnoux; Imen Redjaimia; Nathalie Rouard; Alain Blum; Nicolas Reibel; Nicolas Jay; Marc Braun; Gilles Grosdidier
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 4.  Gastric tube perforation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hideyuki Ubukata; Takeshi Nakachi; Takanobu Tabuchi; Hiroyuki Nagata; Akira Takemura; Jiro Shimazaki; Satoru Konishi; Takafumi Tabuchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Substernal reconstruction following esophagectomy: operation of last resort?

Authors:  Jacob R Moremen; DuyKhanh P Ceppa; Karen M Rieger; Thomas J Birdas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Impact of Reconstruction Route on Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy: Analysis of Esophagectomies in the Japanese National Clinical Database.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Kikuchi; Hideki Endo; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Soji Ozawa; Hiroaki Miyata; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Hisahiro Matsubara; Yuichiro Doki; Yuko Kitagawa; Hiroya Takeuchi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 7.  Esophageal cancer with a double aortic arch: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Kai Kang; Sheng Wang; Fei Xiong; Jindan Kai; Jianjian Wang; Binfeng Li
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 1.637

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.