Literature DB >> 14640924

Efficacy and safety of long-term bisphosphonates in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Paul D Miller1.   

Abstract

Bisphosphonates have been in clinical use since the first approval of etidronate for myositis ossficans progressiva. They have now been used since the early 1990s for osteoporosis. As patients are continued on bisphosphonates and with consideration for bisphosphonate application in younger postmenopausal women, questions of 'how long to treat' are emerging in the clinical community. What is the evidence for continual efficacy and safety? The longest efficacy data where a placebo group was maintained is the 5-year risedronate vertebral fracture data, which demonstrated additional fracture reduction benefit with this bisphosphonate during years 4-5 of use. As bone mineral density (BMD) or biochemical markers of bone resorption (BCM) change very little for at least 1-2 years (and possibly longer) after discontinuing long-term (3-5 years) bisphosphonate use, it seems reasonable to suggest discontinuation for some indefinite period of time after 5 years of use in younger lower-risk postmenopausal women. Monitoring of both BMD and BCM may indicate when to consider reinitiation of bisphosphonate therapy. In higher-risk elderly postmenopausal women who are doing well on long-term bisphosphonate therapy as defined by a stable BMD, height and no incident fractures, the same discussion of a 'honeymoon' period of no treatment could be entertained. However, because there are no data on fracture events post-treatment even without changing BMD or BCM, this author is reluctant to stop bisphosphonates in elderly high-risk patients. My opinion on the continuation of the use in high-risk patients is also predicated on the observations that there does not appear to be any clinically important safety issues with long-term (10-year) use. Concerns about 'oversuppression' of bone turnover and accumulation of microdamage are theoretical and, so far, have no clinical basis for discontinuation in high-risk patients. It will be important, however, for the continual surveillance of bone safety issues by capturing postmarketing fracture data in patients on long-term therapy as well as long-term bone histomorphometry and measurements of bone quality to reassure clinicans about long-term bisphosphonate continuation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14640924     DOI: 10.1517/14656566.4.12.2253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother        ISSN: 1465-6566            Impact factor:   3.889


  5 in total

1.  Risedronate-induced intravascular haemolysis complicated by acute tubular necrosis.

Authors:  Zübeyde Nur Ozkurt; Sefa Güliter; Işik Keleş; Hatice Keleş
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Treatment of metabolic bone disease in patients with chronic renal disease: a perspective for rheumatologists.

Authors:  Paul D Miller
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaws: review, clinical implications and case report.

Authors:  Yusuf Farouk Suleman; Shabnum Meer; Russel Lurie
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2007-12-08

4.  Effective and rapid treatment of painful localized transient osteoporosis (bone marrow edema) with intravenous ibandronate.

Authors:  J D Ringe; A Dorst; H Faber
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Treatment of osteoporosis in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Paul D Miller
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.