Literature DB >> 14638829

Mechanism of tongue protraction in microhylid frogs.

Jay J Meyers1, James C O'Reilly, Jenna A Monroy, Kiisa C Nishikawa.   

Abstract

High-speed videography and muscle denervation experiments were used to elucidate the mechanism of tongue protraction in the microhylid frog Phrynomantis bifasciatus. Unlike most frogs, Phrynomantis has the ability to protract the tongue through a lateral arc of over 200 degrees in the frontal plane. Thus, the tongue can be aimed side to side, independently of head and jaw movements. Denervation experiments demonstrate that the m. genioglossus complex controls lateral tongue aiming with a hydrostatic mechanism. After unilateral denervation of the m. genioglossus complex, the tongue can only be protracted towards the denervated (inactive) side and the range through which the tongue can be aimed is reduced by 75%. Histological sections of the tongue reveal a compartment of perpendicularly arranged muscle fibers, the m. genioglossus dorsoventralis. This compartment, in conjunction with the surrounding connective tissue, generates hydrostatic pressure that powers tongue movements in Phrynomantis. A survey of aiming abilities in 17 additional species of microhylid frogs, representing a total of 12 genera and six subfamilies, indicates that hydrostatic tongues are found throughout this family. Among frogs, this mechanism of tongue protraction was previously known only in Hemisus and may represent a synapomorphy of Hemisus and Microhylidae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14638829     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

1.  Novel phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic brevicipitine and scaphiophrynine toads as revealed by sequences from the nuclear Rag-1 gene.

Authors:  Arie van der Meijden; Miguel Vences; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Prey location, biomechanical constraints, and motor program choice during prey capture in the tomato frog, Dyscophus guineti.

Authors:  Jenna A Monroy; Kiisa C Nishikawa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Rampant tooth loss across 200 million years of frog evolution.

Authors:  Daniel J Paluh; Karina Riddell; Catherine M Early; Maggie M Hantak; Gregory Fm Jongsma; Rachel M Keeffe; Fernanda Magalhães Silva; Stuart V Nielsen; María Camila Vallejo-Pareja; Edward L Stanley; David C Blackburn
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  An adaptive radiation of frogs in a southeast Asian island archipelago.

Authors:  David C Blackburn; Cameron D Siler; Arvin C Diesmos; Jimmy A McGuire; David C Cannatella; Rafe M Brown
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Shooting Mechanisms in Nature: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aimée Sakes; Marleen van der Wiel; Paul W J Henselmans; Johan L van Leeuwen; Dimitra Dodou; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.