Literature DB >> 14638290

Application of the somatic marker hypothesis to individual differences in decision making.

Atsunobu Suzuki1, Akihisa Hirota, Noriyoshi Takasawa, Kazuo Shigemasu.   

Abstract

The somatic marker hypothesis (Damasio, Tranel, & Damasio, 1991) is a controversial theory asserting that somatic activities implicitly bias human behavior. In this study, we examined the relationship between choice behaviors in the Iowa Gambling Task and patterns of skin conductance responses (SCRs) within a healthy population. Results showed that low SCRs for appraising the monetary outcome of risky decisions were related to persistence in risky choices. Such adherence to risky decisions was not related to poor explicit knowledge about the task. On the other hand, anticipatory SCRs and the effect of them on performance were not confirmed. Our findings suggest that a variation in covert physiological appraisal underlies individual differences in decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14638290     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(03)00093-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  20 in total

1.  Emotion, decision-making and substance dependence: a somatic-marker model of addiction.

Authors:  A Verdejo-García; M Pérez-García; A Bechara
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.363

2.  Right ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices mediate adaptive decisions under ambiguity by integrating choice utility and outcome evaluation.

Authors:  Anastasia Christakou; Mick Brammer; Vincent Giampietro; Katya Rubia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Decision-making, somatic markers and emotion processing in opiate users.

Authors:  Kathryn Biernacki; Gill Terrett; Skye N McLennan; Izelle Labuschagne; Phoebe Morton; Peter G Rendell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  When parsimony is not enough: considering dual processes and dual levels of influence in sexual decision making.

Authors:  H Jonathon Rendina
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2015-07-14

5.  Anticipatory emotions in decision tasks: covert markers of value or attentional processes?

Authors:  Tyler Davis; Bradley C Love; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-05-09

6.  Physiological and behavioral signatures of reflective exploratory choice.

Authors:  A Ross Otto; W Bradley Knox; Arthur B Markman; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.526

7.  Brain maps of Iowa gambling task.

Authors:  Ching-Hung Lin; Yao-Chu Chiu; Chou-Ming Cheng; Jen-Chuen Hsieh
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task?

Authors:  Ching-Hung Lin; Yao-Chu Chiu; Po-Lei Lee; Jen-Chuen Hsieh
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  Is deck C an advantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task?

Authors:  Yao-Chu Chiu; Ching-Hung Lin
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Immediate gain is long-term loss: Are there foresighted decision makers in the Iowa Gambling Task?

Authors:  Yao-Chu Chiu; Ching-Hung Lin; Jong-Tsun Huang; Shuyeu Lin; Po-Lei Lee; Jen-Chuen Hsieh
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.