Literature DB >> 14637368

The role of short-wavelength sensitive cones and chromatic aberration in the response to stationary and step accommodation stimuli.

Frances J Rucker1, Philip B Kruger.   

Abstract

The aim of the experiment was to test for a contribution from short-wavelength sensitive cones to the static and step accommodation response, to compare responses from short and long- plus middle-wavelength sensitive cone types, and to examine the contribution of a signal from longitudinal chromatic aberration to the accommodation response. Accommodation was monitored continuously (eight subjects) to a square-wave grating (2.2 c/d; 0.57 contrast) in a Badal optometer. The grating stepped (1.00 D) randomly towards or away from the eye from a starting position of 2.00 D. Five illumination conditions were used to isolate cone responses, and combine them with or without longitudinal chromatic aberration. Accuracy of the response before the step, step amplitude, latencies and time-constants, were compared between conditions using single factor ANOVA and t-test comparisons. Both S-cones and LM-cones mediated static and step accommodation responses. S-cone contrast drives "static" accommodation for near, but the S-cone response is too slow to influence step dynamics when LM-cones participate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14637368     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Blue Light Protects Against Temporal Frequency Sensitive Refractive Changes.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Stephanie Britton; Molly Spatcher; Stephan Hanowsky
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Cone signals for spectacle-lens compensation: differential responses to short and long wavelengths.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Signals for defocus arise from longitudinal chromatic aberration in chick.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Rhea T Eskew; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 4.  Aberrations and accommodation.

Authors:  Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Philip B Kruger; Francisco Lara; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 5.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Determining the accommodative response from wavefront aberrations.

Authors:  Janice Tarrant; Austin Roorda; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Accommodation to wavefront vergence and chromatic aberration.

Authors:  Yinan Wang; Philip B Kruger; James S Li; Peter L Lin; Lawrence R Stark
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Juvenile Tree Shrews Do Not Maintain Emmetropia in Narrow-band Blue Light.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 9.  Monochromatic and white light and the regulation of eye growth.

Authors:  Frances Rucker
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Sensitivity to S-Cone Stimuli and the Development of Myopia.

Authors:  Christopher Patrick Taylor; Timothy G Shepard; Frances J Rucker; Rhea T Eskew
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.799

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.