Literature DB >> 14634790

The cardiovascular safety of high-dose intravenous granisetron in cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

James Carmichael1, Adrian L Harris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cardiovascular safety, tolerability and efficacy of high doses of granisetron for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed malignant disease were given an intravenous infusion of granisetron, 160 microg/kg, over 30 min, starting 15 min after highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients underwent cardiac monitoring for 24 h following the granisetron infusion. Pulse, blood pressure and electrocardiogram (lead II and ambulatory) measurements were taken, and routine clinical chemistry and haematology tests performed. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were taken before the granisetron infusion, and at intervals afterwards. Adverse events were self-assessed using a symptom checklist. Self-assessment categorical rating scales were used to evaluate patient nausea, vomiting and retching.
RESULTS: Ten patients (eight females and two males; average age 41.5 years) completed the trial and were included in the safety and efficacy assessments. No clinically relevant changes in electrocardiogram, pulse rate, blood pressure or laboratory parameters were observed. Furthermore, in the 7 days following dosing there were no serious adverse events leading to withdrawal from the trial. A complete response (no vomiting, retching or, at most, mild nausea) was experienced by five patients. Six patients had no, or mild, nausea and an additional two patients vomited on a maximum of two occasions. Additional antiemetic rescue medication was given to three patients during the 24-h trial period. Despite considerable interpatient variability, C(max) and AUC parameters were proportionally greater than values reported for lower doses of granisetron.
CONCLUSIONS: Granisetron administered at four times the upper recommended dose demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability with no clinically important cardiac effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14634790     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-003-0689-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  5 in total

1.  An evaluation of potential signals for ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest with dolasetron, ondansetron, and granisetron in the fda combined spontaneous reporting system/adverse event reporting system.

Authors:  Frederick M Schnell; Andrew J Coop
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2005-09

Review 2.  Same old story? Do we need to modify our supportive care treatment of elderly cancer patients? Focus on antiemetics.

Authors:  Cesare Gridelli
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of APF530 (extended-release granisetron) in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of two Phase II trials.

Authors:  Nashat Gabrail; Ronald Yanagihara; Marek Spaczyński; William Cooper; Erin O'Boyle; Carrie Smith; Ralph Boccia
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 4.  Extended release granisetron: Review of pharmacologic considerations and clinical role in the perioperative setting.

Authors:  Anh L Ngo; Vwaire Orhurhu; Ivan Urits; Edwin O Delfin; Medha Sharma; Mark R Jones; Omar Viswanath; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

5.  A randomized, placebo-controlled, four-period crossover, definitive QT study of the effects of APF530 exposure, high-dose intravenous granisetron, and moxifloxacin on QTc prolongation.

Authors:  Jay W Mason; Thomas E Moon; Erin O'Boyle; Albert Dietz
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.989

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.