Literature DB >> 14634698

Transmural migration of gastrostomy tube retention discs.

Anne Marie Cahill1, Kevin M Baskin, Robin D Kaye, Charles R Fitz, Richard B Towbin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accidental dislodgment is one of the most frequent causes of avoidable cost and consternation related to gastrostomy tubes. The Sacks-Vine gastrostomy tube, inserted in an antegrade fashion by a percutaneous technique, is extremely stable due to the construction of its disc retention device. However, transmural migration of the retention disc is a known severe delayed complication associated with this tube.
OBJECTIVE: To review the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of transmural migration of gastrostomy retention discs, to propose a mechanism for the progressive development of this complication, and to recommend a method for preventing its occurrence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1991 to October 1999, pediatric interventional radiologists at two children's hospitals performed 300 antegrade gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy primary insertion procedures. A "push-pull" variation of the antegrade approach used for 44 of these insertions is excluded from further analysis. Of the remaining 256 procedures, 5 boys and 3 girls with a mean age of 5.1 years (range 0.8-19 years) were identified from review of the prospectively gathered procedural database with significant complications related to the disc retention component of their gastrostomy tubes. A retrospective analysis was conducted of their medical records, diagnostic imaging, and interventional and surgical findings.
RESULTS: Transmural migration was diagnosed on average 36 months after insertion (16-48 months). The diagnosis was made incidentally during endoscopy (n=1) or fluoroscopy (n=5) in six asymptomatic patients, and during barium enema to explore feculent vomiting and halitosis in two symptomatic patients. Migration of the retention disc fell along a continuum from intramural (n=4) to transmural and intracolonic (n=4), with gastric mucosal erosion, extensive granulation and inflammation in all eight patients. Although there was no evidence of free air in any patient, a gastrocolic fistula was demonstrated in four patients and a gastrocolocutaneous fistula in two of four patients with complete transmural migration. Surgical resection of the disc, gastrostomy, and fistula repair if needed was successfully performed in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Gastrostomy tubes with an internal retention disc are at risk for progressive disc migration into and through the gastric wall, resulting in irretrievable fixation and potential fistula formation. This severe delayed complication results from prolonged traction on the retention disc. Transmural migration may be avoided through improved tube care education, daily disc mobilization, and earlier disc retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14634698     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-003-1096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  12 in total

1.  Radiologic removal of buried gastrostomy bumpers in pediatric patients.

Authors:  J J Crowley; D Vora; C J Becker; L S Harris
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Aortogastric fistula: a complication of tube gastrostomy.

Authors:  R Ware; D Vuksanaj; C McGill
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Gastrostomy tube transmigration: a rare cause of small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  K B O'Dell; R S Gordon; L B Becker
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Nonendoscopic techniques for manipulating Sacks-Vine gastrostomy tubes: technical note.

Authors:  M Glass-Royal; G P Teitelbaum; G J Joseph; A H Matsumoto; K H Barth
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 Nov-1990 Dec       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Late presentation of gastrocolic fistula after percutaneous gastrostomy.

Authors:  E T Fernandes; R Hollabaugh; S D Hixon; G Whitington
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Gastrostomy tube migration.

Authors:  M L Sherman; M J Cosgrove; J M Dennis
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tube migration and impaction in the abdominal wall.

Authors:  R W Shallman; R G NorFleet; J M Hardache
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Complications of retained internal bolster after pediatric percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  D L Mollitt; M L Dokler; J S Evans; S D Jeiven; D E George
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Percutaneous gastrostomy and percutaneous gastrojejunostomy in children: antegrade approach.

Authors:  R B Towbin; W S Ball; G S Bissett
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique.

Authors:  M W Gauderer; J L Ponsky; R J Izant
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  4 in total

1.  The bowed catheter sign: a risk for pericardial tamponade.

Authors:  Richard Towbin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-11-20

2.  Does the placement of a FRECA gastrostomy at the time of laparoscopic fundoplication impact on outcome?

Authors:  N Barber; C A Carden; A A Mahomed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Prevention and management of major complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Kurt Boeykens; Ivo Duysburgh
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05

4.  Delayed Presentation of Submucosal Retained Toothbrush from Self-Inflicted Injury in Patient with Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Caleb H Creswell; Tony L Kille; Matthew R Hoffman; Tabassum Kennedy; Seth H Dailey
Journal:  Case Rep Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.