Literature DB >> 14634549

Elective cesarean delivery for women with a previous anal sphincter rupture.

David S McKenna1, John B Ester, John R Fischer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate elective cesarean delivery for women with a history of anal sphincter rupture. STUDY
DESIGN: The effectiveness of cesarean delivery in parous women with a previous anal sphincter rupture was determined by decision analysis. The outcomes were excess cesarean deliveries and morbidity and mortality rates per prevented case of anal incontinence.
RESULTS: We needed 2.3 cesarean deliveries to prevent one case of anal incontinence. A woman who chooses a cesarean delivery has a 11.3% risk of morbidity compared with a 4.2% risk for vaginal delivery (relative risk, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.6-2.8; P<.001). The relative risk for maternal death from a cesarean delivery is 2.6 (95% CI, 1.5-4.5; P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Continent women with a previous anal sphincter rupture who are delivered vaginally are at high risk for permanent anal incontinence. Cesarean delivery will prevent most cases of anal incontinence, although marginally increasing maternal risk. The increased risk may be justified by the potential benefits. Patients should be counseled on these risks and benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14634549     DOI: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00621-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Counseling after perineal laceration: does it improve functional outcome?

Authors:  Ashley Vasseur; Karine Lepigeon; David Baud; Antje Horsch; Sylvain Meyer; Yvan Vial; Chahin Achtari
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Effect of repeat acute injury on contractile function of the external anal sphincter in an animal model.

Authors:  Sunil Balgobin; Jesus F Acevedo; T Ignacio Montoya; R Ann Word; Clifford Y Wai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Fecal incontinence: a review of prevalence and obstetric risk factors.

Authors:  Andrea Wang; Marsha Guess; Kathleen Connell; Kenneth Powers; George Lazarou; Magdy Mikhail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-06-23

4.  An Evidence-Based Approach to the Evaluation, Diagnostic Assessment and Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2014-09

Review 5.  Obstetrics and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Kathleen Chin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

Review 6.  Evidence-Based Update on Treatments of Fecal Incontinence in Women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  What harm does a second delivery to the pelvic floor?

Authors:  Katharina Jundt; I Scheer; V von Bodungen; F Krumbachner; K Friese; U M Peschers
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 8.  A urogynecologist's view ofthe pelvic floor effects of vaginal delivery/cesarean section for the urologist.

Authors:  René Genadry
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.862

9.  Risk of recurrence, subsequent mode of birth and morbidity for women who experienced severe perineal trauma in a first birth in New South Wales between 2000-2008: a population based data linkage study.

Authors:  Holly Priddis; Hannah G Dahlen; Virginia Schmied; Annie Sneddon; Christine Kettle; Chris Brown; Charlene Thornton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Swati Jha; Victoria Parker
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.