PURPOSE: Inguinal exploration has been a standard approach for the management of palpable undescended testis. We performed prescrotal orchiopexy in patients with palpable undescended testes at our institution and we report our results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of patients with palpable undescended testes treated with prescrotal orchiopexy from 1999 to 2002. All children were referred to a university children's hospital and 1 of 2 surgeons performed the procedures. Examination using anesthesia was performed prior to any incision. If the testis was palpable and could be drawn close to the scrotum, prescrotal orchiopexy was performed. Retractile testes were excluded. RESULTS: During this period 291 patients underwent orchiopexy. Prescrotal orchiopexy was performed in 78 patients. Followup was 1 to 36 months (median 6). The overall success rate was 98.8% and the overall complication rate was 4.7%. At 7 months postoperatively 1 patient had a palpable retractile testicle. One patient had wound hematoma and another patient had wound cellulitis. At 31 months of followup 1 patient was considered to have a 25% decrease in testis size. All patients were without clinical evidence of hernia or hydrocele. CONCLUSIONS: Prescrotal orchiopexy is a successful procedure in select patients with a low complication rate. It has the advantage of a single, perfectly cosmetic incision. This approach should be considered an option when performing orchiopexy in a patient with a palpable, mobile undescended testis.
PURPOSE: Inguinal exploration has been a standard approach for the management of palpable undescended testis. We performed prescrotal orchiopexy in patients with palpable undescended testes at our institution and we report our results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of patients with palpable undescended testes treated with prescrotal orchiopexy from 1999 to 2002. All children were referred to a university children's hospital and 1 of 2 surgeons performed the procedures. Examination using anesthesia was performed prior to any incision. If the testis was palpable and could be drawn close to the scrotum, prescrotal orchiopexy was performed. Retractile testes were excluded. RESULTS: During this period 291 patients underwent orchiopexy. Prescrotal orchiopexy was performed in 78 patients. Followup was 1 to 36 months (median 6). The overall success rate was 98.8% and the overall complication rate was 4.7%. At 7 months postoperatively 1 patient had a palpable retractile testicle. One patient had wound hematoma and another patient had wound cellulitis. At 31 months of followup 1 patient was considered to have a 25% decrease in testis size. All patients were without clinical evidence of hernia or hydrocele. CONCLUSIONS: Prescrotal orchiopexy is a successful procedure in select patients with a low complication rate. It has the advantage of a single, perfectly cosmetic incision. This approach should be considered an option when performing orchiopexy in a patient with a palpable, mobile undescended testis.