Literature DB >> 14632852

The prevalence of male urinary incontinence in four centres: the UREPIK study.

P Boyle1, C Robertson, C Mazzetta, M Keech, F D R Hobbs, R Fourcade, L Kiemeney, C Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report the results of the prevalence and health status associated with male urinary incontinence (UI) in a population-based, multicentre study in four countries, and to assess the epidemiology of this condition. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A standard questionnaire asking about frequency and amount of urine loss, use of pads and stress incontinence, was used to measure the prevalence of UI among men in four countries (Boxmeer, The Netherlands; Auxerre, France; Birmingham, UK; and Seoul, Korea). Self-reported urinary leakage was also recorded, with details of visits to the doctor for the symptoms. The samples were selected randomly from population registers of men aged 40-79 years, which provided representative samples in each community.
RESULTS: In all, 4979 men responded; from incontinence symptom scores, 7.3% of men aged 40-79 years in Auxerre, 16.3% in Boxmeer, 14.4% in Birmingham and 4.3% in Seoul reported mild to severe UI. On a self-reported question, 14.8% and 14.5% of men in Birmingham and Boxmeer thought that they had urinary leakage, compared with 7.5% and 7.1% of men in Auxerre and Seoul, but typically the reported incontinence was leaking drops of urine a few times a week. Of men with urinary leakage in the three European centres, 25.9% visited the doctor with this problem, compared with only 9.0% of men in Seoul. Of men in the European centres, 5.9% used pads at least occasionally, compared with only 1.6% of men in Seoul. UI was age-related and the reporting of it varied among centres, with 14.4% of men in Birmingham and 12.7% of men in Boxmeer aged 40-49 years reporting mild to severe UI, compared with 5.2% in Auxerre and 1.9% in Seoul. Among men aged 60-69 years the corresponding percentages were 13.7% in Birmingham, 22.6% in Boxmeer, 9.2% in Auxerre and 8.0% in Seoul.
CONCLUSIONS: UI is more common in older men and relatively uncommon among younger men. Some men reported no problems on the symptom questionnaire but replied positively to a direct question. Surprisingly many men wear protective pads at least occasionally as a result of their problem. UI appears to be a problem for men and which remains largely untreated; this may partly be a result of cultural differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14632852     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04526.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  15 in total

1.  Introducing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate alongside transurethral resection of the prostate improves outcomes of each procedure.

Authors:  N Wilson; M Mikhail; P Acher; R Lodge; A Young
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  CUA guideline on adult overactive bladder.

Authors:  Jacques Corcos; Mikolaj Przydacz; Lysanne Campeau; Gary Gray; Duane Hickling; Christiane Honeine; Sidney B Radomski; Lynn Stothers; Adrian Wagg; Frcp Lond
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Links between lower urinary tract symptoms, intermittent hypoxia and diabetes: Causes or cures?

Authors:  Lisa L Abler; Chad M Vezina
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.931

4.  Management of male urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Katie C Moore; Malcolm G Lucas
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-04

5.  Partners agree that the treatment of LUTS reduces patients' bother and improves their quality of life: prospective 12 years follow-up study.

Authors:  Said Fadel Mishriki; Samuel J S Grimsley; Ghulam Nabi; Nicholas Paul Cohen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Measurement of benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment effects on male sexual function.

Authors:  T A Skolarus; J T Wei
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Prevalence, treatment and known risk factors of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder in the non-institutionalized Portuguese population.

Authors:  Sofia Correia; Paulo Dinis; Francisco Rolo; Nuno Lunet
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-08-14

8.  Male urinary incontinence: prevalence, risk factors, and preventive interventions.

Authors:  Tatyana A Shamliyan; Jean F Wyman; Ryan Ping; Timothy J Wilt; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

9.  Dietary Antioxidants and Longitudinal Changes in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Elderly Men: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study.

Authors:  Kathleen F Holton; Lynn M Marshall; Jackilen Shannon; Jodi A Lapidus; James M Shikany; Douglas C Bauer; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2015-09-26

Review 10.  A review of quality-of-life questionnaires for urinary incontinence and overactive bladder: which ones to use and why?

Authors:  Louis S Matza; Teresa M Zyczynski; Tamara Bavendam
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.