Literature DB >> 14632700

The impact of screening for Type 2 diabetes in siblings of patients with established diabetes.

A J Farmer1, H Doll, J C Levy, P M Salkovskis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Targeted screening for Type 2 diabetes has been proposed as a method of identifying people with, or at risk of, the disease in order to implement preventive care. AIM: To assess the changes in anxiety, well-being, and cognitions associated with screening for Type 2 diabetes in people at increased risk of diabetes after 1 year; and to identify potential predictors of increased anxiety and lower well being over this period. DESIGN AND
SETTING: One-year follow up of a cohort of non-diabetic siblings of those with Type 2 diabetes registered with general practitioners in Oxfordshire and Northamptonshire who were identified for participation in a programme to undertake sib-pair genetic analysis.
METHODS: Potential families were selected through identification of people with Type 2 diabetes. Family members aged 35-74 years, who did not have diabetes and who were willing to participate in the study, completed measures before receiving the results of a fasting plasma glucose test, and 1 year later. Measures included the Spielberger State Anxiety Scale-short form (SSAI-SF), the Well-Being Questionnaire 12 item scale (WBQ-12), and measures of cognitions about developing diabetes. The Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI) was completed before receiving the results of the tests to assess its relationship with anxiety at 1 year.
RESULTS: A cohort of 431 individuals was identified, of whom 328 (76%) returned fully completed WBQ scales both initially and at 1 year. State anxiety measured with the SSAI-SF fell from 34.5 (95% CI 33.4-35.6) to 32.3 (31.2-33.4) at 1 year (P < 0.0001). Mean WBQ-12 scores rose (i.e. improved) from 26.8 (26.0-27.4) to 27.4 (26.7-28.1) (P = 0.008). SSAI-SF and WBQ-12 mean scores over 1 year did not differ between participants receiving a normal or an at-risk test result. However, those receiving an at-risk test result were more likely, at 1 year, to consider themselves at increased likelihood of developing diabetes (P < 0.001) and to report thinking about what it would be like to develop diabetes (P = 0.006). A score in the upper tertile of the initial HAI was associated with an increased level of anxiety at 1 year (adjusted odds ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4, P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that an 'at-risk' test result leads to sustained anxiety or reduced well being at 1 year compared with those receiving a normal test result. However, further studies are required to clarify levels of anxiety prior to screening to assess the overall impact of the process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14632700     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01042.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  6 in total

1.  How can we identify candidates at highest risk--to screen or not to screen?

Authors:  N C Barengo; J O Tuomilehto
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  TRAF4 functions as an intermediate of GITR-induced NF-kappaB activation.

Authors:  E M Esparza; R H Arch
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Should we screen for emotional distress in type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Authors:  François Pouwer
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Psychological well-being of gynecologic and obstetric patients: a validation of the 12-item Well-Being Questionnaire (W-BQ12).

Authors:  Rafał Watrowski; Anke Rohde
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Are people with negative diabetes screening tests falsely reassured? Parallel group cohort study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Charlotte A M Paddison; Helen C Eborall; Stephen Sutton; David P French; Joana Vasconcelos; A Toby Prevost; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-11-30

6.  Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen C Eborall; Simon J Griffin; A Toby Prevost; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; David P French; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.