Literature DB >> 14632605

Cross- and iso- oriented surrounds modulate the contrast response function: the effect of surround contrast.

Cong Yu1, Stanley A Klein, Dennis M Levi.   

Abstract

The detectability and appearance of visual targets can be modulated by surround stimuli. In this study we asked how cross- and iso-oriented surrounds modulate contrast detection and discrimination in foveal vision. We systematically measured the Threshold-versus-Contrast (TvC) functions over a wide range of pedestal and surround contrasts. Our results show that cross-oriented surrounds lower the contrast threshold over the entire range of pedestal and surround contrasts, but iso-surround modulation of the TvC function is dependent on the relative contrast, being facilitative when the surround/pedestal contrast ratio Csur/Cped < 1 and suppressive when Csur/Cped > 1. Data fitting indicates that cross-surround modulation (facilitation) is mainly due to improved gain, except at very low and high surround contrasts. Iso-surround modulation on the other hand is more complicated, probably reflecting more than one surround process as determined by the relative contrast.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14632605     DOI: 10.1167/3.8.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  17 in total

1.  Contextual effects in fine spatial discriminations.

Authors:  Lynn A Olzak; Pentti I Laurinen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; David J Holmes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Detection of Gabor patterns of different sizes, shapes, phases and eccentricities.

Authors:  John M Foley; Srinivasa Varadharajan; Chin C Koh; Mylene C Q Farias
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Lateral effects in pattern vision.

Authors:  John M Foley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Quantitative multifocal fMRI shows active suppression in human V1.

Authors:  Miika Pihlaja; Linda Henriksson; Andrew C James; Simo Vanni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Sensitivity to gaze-contingent contrast increments in naturalistic movies: An exploratory report and model comparison.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Michael Dorr; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Two distinct mechanisms of suppression in human vision.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Matteo Carandini; Suzanne McKee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Psychometric functions for detection and discrimination with and without flankers.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Spatial frequency bandwidth of surround suppression tuning curves.

Authors:  Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; John P Grady; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Peeling plaids apart: context counteracts cross-orientation contrast masking.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.