Literature DB >> 14632229

Species richness in agamid lizards: chance, body size, sexual selection or ecology?

Devi Stuart-Fox1, Ian P F Owens.   

Abstract

Why does species richness vary so greatly across lineages? Traditionally, variation in species richness has been attributed to deterministic processes, although it is equally plausible that it may result from purely stochastic processes. We show that, based on the best available phylogenetic hypothesis, the pattern of cladogenesis among agamid lizards is not consistent with a random model, with some lineages having more species, and others fewer species, than expected by chance. We then use phylogenetic comparative methods to test six types of deterministic explanation for variation in species richness: body size, life history, sexual selection, ecological generalism, range size and latitude. Of eight variables we tested, only sexual size dimorphism and sexual dichromatism predicted species richness. Increases in species richness are associated with increases in sexual dichromatism but reductions in sexual size dimorphism. Consistent with recent comparative studies, we find no evidence that species richness is associated with small body size or high fecundity. Equally, we find no evidence that species richness covaries with ecological generalism, latitude or range size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14632229     DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00573.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  11 in total

1.  Is sociality required for the evolution of communicative complexity? Evidence weighed against alternative hypotheses in diverse taxonomic groups.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Joan Garcia-Porta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Intraspecific sexual selection on a speciation trait, male coloration, in the Lake Victoria cichlid Pundamilia nyererei.

Authors:  Martine E Maan; Ole Seehausen; Linda Söderberg; Lisa Johnson; Erwin A P Ripmeester; Hillary D J Mrosso; Martin I Taylor; Tom J M van Dooren; Jacques J M van Alphen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sexual selection, body mass and molecular evolution interact to predict diversification in birds.

Authors:  Maider Iglesias-Carrasco; Michael D Jennions; Simon Y W Ho; David A Duchêne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sexual Dichromatism Drives Diversification within a Major Radiation of African Amphibians.

Authors:  Daniel M Portik; Rayna C Bell; David C Blackburn; Aaron M Bauer; Christopher D Barratt; William R Branch; Marius Burger; Alan Channing; Timothy J Colston; Werner Conradie; J Maximilian Dehling; Robert C Drewes; Raffael Ernst; Eli Greenbaum; Václav Gvoždík; James Harvey; Annika Hillers; Mareike Hirschfeld; Gregory F M Jongsma; Jos Kielgast; Marcel T Kouete; Lucinda P Lawson; Adam D Leaché; Simon P Loader; Stefan Lötters; Arie Van Der Meijden; Michele Menegon; Susanne Müller; Zoltán T Nagy; Caleb Ofori-Boateng; Annemarie Ohler; Theodore J Papenfuss; Daniela Rößler; Ulrich Sinsch; Mark-Oliver Rödel; Michael Veith; Jens Vindum; Ange-Ghislain Zassi-Boulou; Jimmy A McGuire
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Sexual selection, natural selection and the evolution of dimorphic coloration and ornamentation in agamid lizards.

Authors:  Devi M Stuart-Fox; Terry J Ord
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Habitat use affects morphological diversification in dragon lizards.

Authors:  D C Collar; J A Schulte; B C O'Meara; J B Losos
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Gall-induction in insects: evolutionary dead-end or speciation driver?

Authors:  Nate B Hardy; Lyn G Cook
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Genome Size and Species Diversification.

Authors:  Ken Kraaijeveld
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.119

9.  Concordant female mate preferences in the cichlid fish Tropheus moorii.

Authors:  Bernd Steinwender; Stephan Koblmüller; Kristina M Sefc
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Darwinism for the Genomic Age: Connecting Mutation to Diversification.

Authors:  Xia Hua; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.