Literature DB >> 14632095

Perceptual indicators of environmental health, future land use, and stewardship.

Joanna Burger1, O Myers, C S Boring, C Dixon, J C Jeitner, J Leonard, C Lord, M McMahon, R Ramos, S Shukla, Michael Gochfeld.   

Abstract

There are important linkages between the health of humans and the environment, restoration of degraded lands, and long-term stewardship of public lands, yet most environmental indicators deal only with assessing the physical and biological aspects of ecosystems. In this article, we examine the ratings of perceptions of several environmental problems for their utility as indicators of environmental quality, and examine perceptions of future land use by people interviewed in Santa Fe, New Mexico, near the Department of Energy's (DOE) Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Overall, people with lower incomes rated environmental problems as more severe than others, were more willing to spend federal funds to solve them, and were consistent in their ratings of severity of environmental problems and their willingness to spend federal funds. Cleaning up LANL and other Department of Energy sites, received the highest rating for expenditure of federal funds. The highest rated future uses for DOE sites were for recreation and for National Environmental Research Parks. People with less education generally gave higher ratings to most future land uses for DOE than did those with more education. However, those with higher education gave higher ratings to nuclear reprocessing, and nuclear material storage. Where there were differences, the people interviewed at Santa Fe rated all environmental problems (except pesticides) as more severe than did those previously interviewed in Albuquerque (located farther from the LANL site), and they were more willing to spend federal funds on these problems. Ratings for all future land uses did not differ between the Santa Fe and Albuquerque respondents. These perception-based indicators show general agreement among people living close and farther away from LANL with respect to cleaning up LANL and the future land uses for the site. These indicators should be considered by regulators, site personnel, and policy makers in future management and land use decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14632095     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026151432175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  11 in total

1.  Risk perception in context: the Savannah River Site Stakeholder Study.

Authors:  B L Williams; S Brown; M Greenberg; M A Kahn
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Integrating environmental restoration and ecological restoration: long-term stewardship at the department of energy.

Authors:  J Burger
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Perceptions of general environmental problems, willingness to expend federal funds on these problems, and concerns regarding the Los Alamos National Laboratory: Hispanics are more concerned than Whites.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; O Myers; C S Boring; C Dixon; C Lord; R Ramos; S Shukla; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Risk perception, federal spending, and the Savannah River Site: attitudes of hunters and fishermen.

Authors:  J Burger; J Sanchez; J W Gibbons; M Gochfeld
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  American Indians, hunting and fishing rates, risk, and the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory.

Authors:  J Burger
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Environmental attitudes and perceptions of future land use at the Savannah River Site: are there racial differences?

Authors:  J Burger
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  1998-02-20

7.  Recreation and risk around Los Alamos: are Hispanics more at risk?

Authors:  J Burger
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2000-10-27

8.  Risk concerns, land use, stewardship, and the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory: attitudes of the Shoshone-Bannock and other American Indians.

Authors:  J Burger; D E Roush; R Ramos; M Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Factors in exposure assessment: ethnic and socioeconomic differences in fishing and consumption of fish caught along the Savannah River.

Authors:  J Burger; W L Stephens; C S Boring; M Kuklinski; J W Gibbons; M Gochfeld
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  Fishing in urban New Jersey: ethnicity affects information sources, perception, and compliance.

Authors:  J Burger; K K Pflugh; L Lurig; L A Von Hagen; S Von Hagen
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.000

View more
  2 in total

1.  Interaction between the environment and animals in urban settings: integrated and participatory planning.

Authors:  Elvira Tarsitano
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Environmental monitoring and analysis of faecal contamination in an urban setting in the city of Bari (Apulia region, Italy): health and hygiene implications.

Authors:  Elvira Tarsitano; Grazia Greco; Nicola Decaro; Francesco Nicassio; Maria Stella Lucente; Canio Buonavoglia; Maria Tempesta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.