Literature DB >> 14631371

Identical cytokeratin expression pattern CK7+/CK20- in esophageal and cardiac cancer: etiopathological and clinical implications.

A Driessen1, P Nafteux, T Lerut, D Van Raemdonck, P De Leyn, L Filez, F Penninckx, K Geboes, N Ectors.   

Abstract

Surgical treatment and prognosis is different in esophageal, cardiac and distal gastric adenocarcinomas. Determination of the origin, in particular of adenocarcinomas situated at the gastroesophageal junction, may be difficult. It has been suggested that esophageal adenocarcinomas are characterized by a specific cytokeratin pattern, namely the CK7+/CK20- pattern. According to the same authors, this cytokeratin pattern is absent in gastric adenocarcinomas. The aim of our study is to evaluate if this cytokeratin pattern CK7+/CK20- is absent in cardiac and distal gastric adenocarcinomas. Therefore, we evaluated the combined immunohistochemical expression of CK7 and CK20 on paraffin-embedded material of 214 resection specimens for adenocarcinoma, comprising 66 esophageal, 73 cardiac and 75 distal gastric adenocarcinomas (UICC-classification). The adenocarcinomas were subtyped into intestinal- and diffuse-type according to the Lauren classification. The immunohistochemical staining was considered as positive if 50% or more of the tumor cells were stained. Statistical analysis has been performed applying the chi2-test. The tumors situated at the gastroesophageal junction, esophageal as well as cardiac adenocarcinomas, showed predominantly a CK7+/CK20- expression pattern (67 vs 68%), whereas this cytokeratin pattern is rather uncommon in distal gastric adenocarcinomas (31%, P<4 x 10(-5)). Independent of their localization, intestinal- as well as diffuse-type adenocarcinomas have a similar cytokeratin pattern. Our data show that the combined expression of CK7 and CK20 is different for the adenocarcinomas situated on both sides of the gastroesophageal junction compared to the distal gastric adenocarcinomas. However, in contrast to data in the literature, the combined expression of CK7 and CK20 has a low specificity in the distinction between esophageal and cardiac adenocarcinomas. This may suggest a similar origin (cell lineage) and thus may have an impact on therapeutic strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14631371     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pathologic research update of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Shu-Juan Ni; Wei-Qi Sheng; Xiang Du
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Squamous cell carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: field effect versus metastasis.

Authors:  M M Streppel; P D Siersema; W W de Leng; F H Morsink; F P Vleggaar; A Maitra; E A Montgomery; G J Offerhaus
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  MTHFR C677T polymorphism and differential methylation status in gastric cancer: an association with Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Eduardo Henrique Cunha Neves Filho; Markenia Kelia Santos Alves; Valeska Portela Lima; Silvia Helena Barem Rabenhorst
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Immunohistochemical panel for distinguishing esophageal adenocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma: a combination of p63, cytokeratin 5/6, MUC5AC, and anterior gradient homolog 2 allows optimal subtyping.

Authors:  Michael A DiMaio; Shirley Kwok; Kelli D Montgomery; Anson W Lowe; Reetesh K Pai
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Adenocarcinoma of Barrett's esophagus in a dog.

Authors:  James K Chambers; Tsubasa Saito; Kenjiro Fukushima; Shigeru Kakuta; Jun Nakayama; Koichi Ohno; Hajime Tsujimoto; Hiroyuki Nakayama; Kazuyuki Uchida
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 1.628

6.  Circulating uPA as a potential prognostic biomarker for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao He; Xiaoling Xu; Guanxia Zhu; Hong Ye
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.