Literature DB >> 14630934

Role of transcriptional regulation in controlling fluxes in central carbon metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A chemostat culture study.

Pascale Daran-Lapujade1, Mickel L A Jansen, Jean-Marc Daran, Walter van Gulik, Johannes H de Winde, Jack T Pronk.   

Abstract

In contrast to batch cultivation, chemostat cultivation allows the identification of carbon source responses without interference by carbon-catabolite repression, accumulation of toxic products, and differences in specific growth rate. This study focuses on the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, grown in aerobic, carbon-limited chemostat cultures. Genome-wide transcript levels and in vivo fluxes were compared for growth on two sugars, glucose and maltose, and for two C2-compounds, ethanol and acetate. In contrast to previous reports on batch cultures, few genes (180 genes) responded to changes of the carbon source by a changed transcript level. Very few transcript levels were changed when glucose as the growth-limiting nutrient was compared with maltose (33 transcripts), or when acetate was compared with ethanol (16 transcripts). Although metabolic flux analysis using a stoichiometric model revealed major changes in the central carbon metabolism, only 117 genes exhibited a significantly different transcript level when sugars and C2-compounds were provided as the growth-limiting nutrient. Despite the extensive knowledge on carbon source regulation in yeast, many of the carbon source-responsive genes encoded proteins with unknown or incompletely characterized biological functions. In silico promoter analysis of carbon source-responsive genes confirmed the involvement of several known transcriptional regulators and suggested the involvement of additional regulators. Transcripts involved in the glyoxylate cycle and gluconeogenesis showed a good correlation with in vivo fluxes. This correlation was, however, not observed for other important pathways, including the pentose-phosphate pathway, tricarboxylic acid cycle, and, in particular, glycolysis. These results indicate that in vivo fluxes in the central carbon metabolism of S. cerevisiae grown in steadystate, carbon-limited chemostat cultures are controlled to a large extent via post-transcriptional mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14630934     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M309578200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  98 in total

1.  The renaissance of continuous culture in the post-genomics age.

Authors:  Alan T Bull
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Uncovering transcriptional regulation of metabolism by using metabolic network topology.

Authors:  Kiran Raosaheb Patil; Jens Nielsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Metabolic engineering in the -omics era: elucidating and modulating regulatory networks.

Authors:  Goutham N Vemuri; Aristos A Aristidou
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Investigation of two distinct flavone synthases for plant-specific flavone biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Effendi Leonard; Yajun Yan; Kok Hong Lim; Mattheos A G Koffas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Transcriptional control of gluconeogenesis in Aspergillus nidulans.

Authors:  Michael J Hynes; Edyta Szewczyk; Sandra L Murray; Yumi Suzuki; Meryl A Davis; Heather M Sealy-Lewis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Unraveling the complexity of flux regulation: a new method demonstrated for nutrient starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sergio Rossell; Coen C van der Weijden; Alexander Lindenbergh; Arjen van Tuijl; Christof Francke; Barbara M Bakker; Hans V Westerhoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Quantitative analysis of the high temperature-induced glycolytic flux increase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals dominant metabolic regulation.

Authors:  Jarne Postmus; André B Canelas; Jildau Bouwman; Barbara M Bakker; Walter van Gulik; M Joost Teixeira de Mattos; Stanley Brul; Gertien J Smits
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  The functional structure of central carbon metabolism in Pseudomonas putida KT2440.

Authors:  Suresh Sudarsan; Sarah Dethlefsen; Lars M Blank; Martin Siemann-Herzberg; Andreas Schmid
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Substrate specificity of thiamine pyrophosphate-dependent 2-oxo-acid decarboxylases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Gabriele Romagnoli; Marijke A H Luttik; Peter Kötter; Jack T Pronk; Jean-Marc Daran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Quantitative Physiology of Non-Energy-Limited Retentostat Cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at Near-Zero Specific Growth Rates.

Authors:  Yaya Liu; Anissa El Masoudi; Jack T Pronk; Walter M van Gulik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.