Literature DB >> 14630412

Sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modelling.

Igor G Dubus1, Colin D Brown, Sabine Beulke.   

Abstract

There is worldwide interest in the application of probabilistic approaches to pesticide fate models to account for uncertainty in exposure assessments. The first steps in conducting a probabilistic analysis of any system are: (i) to identify where the uncertainties come from; and (ii) to pinpoint those uncertainties that are likely to affect most of the predictions made. This article aims at addressing those two points within the context of exposure assessment for pesticides through a review of the different sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modelling. The extensive listing of sources of uncertainty clearly demonstrates that pesticide fate modelling is laced with uncertainty. More importantly, the review suggests that the probabilistic approaches, which are typically being deployed to account for uncertainty in the pesticide fate modelling, such as Monte Carlo modelling, ignore a number of key sources of uncertainty, which are likely to have a significant effect on the prediction of environmental concentrations for pesticides (e.g. model error, modeller subjectivity). Future research should concentrate on quantifying the impact these uncertainties have on exposure assessments and on developing procedures that enable their integration within probabilistic assessments.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14630412     DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00362-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Some considerations on the use of simple box models of contaminant fate in soils.

Authors:  A Pistocchi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Comments on pesticide risk assessment by the revision of Directive EU 91/414.

Authors:  Matteo Balderacchi; Marco Trevisan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Development of a screening tool to assess the temporal risk of pesticides leaching to groundwater using the source, target, vector approach. An Irish case study for shallow groundwater.

Authors:  Herve E Labite; Enda Cummins
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  An overview on common aspects influencing the dissipation pattern of pesticides: a review.

Authors:  Waziha Farha; A M Abd El-Aty; Md Musfiqur Rahman; Ho-Chul Shin; Jae-Han Shim
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Modeling the risk of water pollution by pesticides from imbalanced data.

Authors:  Aneta Trajanov; Vladimir Kuzmanovski; Benoit Real; Jonathan Marks Perreau; Sašo Džeroski; Marko Debeljak
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Fine scale spatial variability of microbial pesticide degradation in soil: scales, controlling factors, and implications.

Authors:  Arnaud Dechesne; Nora Badawi; Jens Aamand; Barth F Smets
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water - the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring.

Authors:  Samuel D Supowit; Isaac B Roll; Viet D Dang; Kevin J Kroll; Nancy D Denslow; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.