Susan Bragg Leight1. 1. Department of Nursing, Fairmont State College, Fairmont, West Virginia 26554, USA. sleight888@aol.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This article describes the application of the vulnerable populations conceptual model to rural health. Vulnerable populations are social groups who have an increased susceptibility to adverse health outcomes. Evidence of this differential in vulnerability or increased risk includes premature mortality, comparative morbidity, decreased functional status, and diminished quality of life. ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK: The vulnerable populations conceptual model postulates that there are interrelationships among resource availability, relative risk, and health status. Resource availability speaks to socioeconomic and environmental resources that are operationalized in this model as income, jobs, education, housing, availability of health care, quality of health care, and patterns of family and community life. Relative risk addresses the likelihood of exposure to risk factors and is reflected in lifestyle behaviors and choices and exposure to stressful events. Health status is operationalized as morbidity and mortality. FINDINGS: This review of the literature supports the utility of the vulnerable populations conceptual model in working with rural populations. IMPLICATIONS: This model has potential utility to inform nursing research, practice, and policy about the opportunities and resources needed to achieve and maintain health in rural communities.
BACKGROUND: This article describes the application of the vulnerable populations conceptual model to rural health. Vulnerable populations are social groups who have an increased susceptibility to adverse health outcomes. Evidence of this differential in vulnerability or increased risk includes premature mortality, comparative morbidity, decreased functional status, and diminished quality of life. ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK: The vulnerable populations conceptual model postulates that there are interrelationships among resource availability, relative risk, and health status. Resource availability speaks to socioeconomic and environmental resources that are operationalized in this model as income, jobs, education, housing, availability of health care, quality of health care, and patterns of family and community life. Relative risk addresses the likelihood of exposure to risk factors and is reflected in lifestyle behaviors and choices and exposure to stressful events. Health status is operationalized as morbidity and mortality. FINDINGS: This review of the literature supports the utility of the vulnerable populations conceptual model in working with rural populations. IMPLICATIONS: This model has potential utility to inform nursing research, practice, and policy about the opportunities and resources needed to achieve and maintain health in rural communities.
Authors: Margaret R Savoca; Thomas A Arcury; Xiaoyan Leng; Haiying Chen; Ronny A Bell; Andrea M Anderson; Teresa Kohrman; Gregg H Gilbert; Sara A Quandt Journal: J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2011
Authors: Gubela Mji; Stine H Braathen; Richard Vergunst; Elsje Scheffler; Janis Kritzinger; Hasheem Mannan; Marguerite Schneider; Leslie Swartz; Surona Visagie Journal: Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Date: 2017-02-08
Authors: Lindsey L Monteith; Ryan Holliday; Talia L Brown; Lisa A Brenner; Nathaniel V Mohatt Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2020-05-30 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Isabel María Fernández-Medina; María Dolores Ruíz-Fernández; Felisa Gálvez-Ramírez; Evangelina Martínez-Mengíbar; Manuel Eduardo Ruíz-García; María Del Mar Jiménez-Lasserrotte; Ángela María Ortega-Galán; José Manuel Hernández-Padilla Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2021-12-23