Literature DB >> 14629206

Impacts on practitioners of using research-based carer assessment tools: experiences from the UK, Canada and Sweden, with insights from Australia.

Nancy Guberman1, Elinor Nicholas, Mike Nolan, Doris Rembicki, Ulla Lundh, Janice Keefe.   

Abstract

Researchers and practitioners in several Western countries have recently developed tools for assessing the situation of the carers of adults who are ill, elderly or have disabilities. The present article describes the impact of three such assessment tools, from Canada, the UK and Sweden, on the professional practice of assessors. All tools were tested in agency-based studies. Focus groups, workshops and interviews with assessors were employed to understand the impact on professionals and their practice. An Australian researcher and case manager comments on these experiences from her unique perspective. The results reveal that the use of carer assessments can lead to changes in the appropriateness of intervention by informing practitioners of issues which are given little attention, but which impact on the adequacy of interventions to the service user. Across the projects, most workers found that the tools facilitated a more comprehensive, in-depth and carer-focused assessment. Experience across all the projects suggests that, used sensitively, such tools and approaches can play a key role in transforming the relationship between carers, and the health and social care system. Giving carers a legitimate voice, acknowledging their perspective and expertise, and making them central to assessment processes accords them status both as active partners, and as individuals with their own needs and aspirations, rather than seeing them primarily as resources. As a result of their experiences, many workers and administrators concluded that home-care programmes must change their mandate to include carers among their clients, raising the issue of available monetary and human resources to meet the needs of this group. In addition, as our Australian colleague points out, time, efficiency, relevance, benefit and minimal intrusiveness are important factors for practitioners which influence their use of assessment tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14629206     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00434.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  4 in total

1.  Patient and carer perceptions of need and associations with care-giving burden in an integrated adult mental health service.

Authors:  Michelle Cleary; Adele Freeman; Glenn E Hunt; Garry Walter
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  The impact of TCARE® on service recommendation, use, and caregiver well-being.

Authors:  Jung Kwak; Rhonda J V Montgomery; Karl Kosloski; Josh Lang
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2011-05-17

3.  Enhancing primary care support for informal carers: A scoping study with professional stakeholders.

Authors:  Michele Peters; Stacey Rand; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2019-11-26

Review 4.  Implementing family involvement in the treatment of patients with psychosis: a systematic review of facilitating and hindering factors.

Authors:  Erica Eassom; Domenico Giacco; Aysegul Dirik; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.