Literature DB >> 14629202

Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia in general practice: the experience of health professionals.

Elizabeth Perkins1, Caroline Carlisle, Nigel Jackson.   

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common curable bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the UK. The infection is asymptomatic in up to 70% of women, and if untreated, can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and infertility. Chlamydial infection can be diagnosed using urine testing and is easily treated with antibiotics. In 1999, the UK Department of Health funded a pilot opportunistic Chlamydia screening programme in two health authorities. All sexually active women between the ages of 16 and 24 years attending general practices and other healthcare settings, such as family planning clinics, antenatal clinics and genito-urinary medicine services, were offered the opportunity to be screened for Chlamydia, regardless of the purpose of their visit. This evaluation was funded to assess the feasibility and acceptability of opportunistic screening. The evaluation was conducted using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The present paper describes findings from the qualitative evaluation study arising from the health professionals' experience of opportunistic screening in general practice. Receptionists were central to the opportunistic screening model in general practice and it was this aspect of the model that raised most concerns. Whilst general practitioners reported that the involvement of receptionists saved them time, the receptionists themselves were sometimes drawn into discussions for which they felt ill equipped and unsuitably located. This research suggests that a call-recall national screening programme would provide a better model to undertake Chlamydia screening in general practice. The advantages of this model are threefold. First, each individual within the target age range can receive information about Chlamydia through the post. Secondly, the test and more detailed information can be managed by a practice nurse in a private and confidential setting. Thirdly, individuals are not repeatedly offered the test when visiting the surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14629202     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00437.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  4 in total

1.  Practice nurse chlamydia testing in Australian general practice: a qualitative study of benefits, barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Rebecca Lorch; Jane Hocking; Rebecca Guy; Alaina Vaisey; Anna Wood; Dyani Lewis; Meredith Temple-Smith
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Provision of chlamydia testing, and training of primary health care staff about chlamydia testing, across four European countries.

Authors:  Anneli Uusküla; Ellie J Ricketts; Claire Rugman; Ruth R Kalda; Hans Fredlund; Johan Hedlund; Brigitte Dunais; Pia P Touboul; Cliodna McNulty
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  A study of young peoples' attitudes to opportunistic Chlamydia testing in UK general practice.

Authors:  Joanne Heritage; Melvyn Jones
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Application of the COM-B model to barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice for young people and primary care practitioners: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lorraine K McDonagh; John M Saunders; Jackie Cassell; Tyrone Curtis; Hamad Bastaki; Thomas Hartney; Greta Rait
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 7.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.