Literature DB >> 14628312

Auditory response to pulsed radiofrequency energy.

J A Elder1, C K Chou.   

Abstract

The human auditory response to pulses of radiofrequency (RF) energy, commonly called RF hearing, is a well established phenomenon. RF induced sounds can be characterized as low intensity sounds because, in general, a quiet environment is required for the auditory response. The sound is similar to other common sounds such as a click, buzz, hiss, knock, or chirp. Effective radiofrequencies range from 2.4 to 10000 MHz, but an individual's ability to hear RF induced sounds is dependent upon high frequency acoustic hearing in the kHz range above about 5 kHz. The site of conversion of RF energy to acoustic energy is within or peripheral to the cochlea, and once the cochlea is stimulated, the detection of RF induced sounds in humans and RF induced auditory responses in animals is similar to acoustic sound detection. The fundamental frequency of RF induced sounds is independent of the frequency of the radiowaves but dependent upon head dimensions. The auditory response has been shown to be dependent upon the energy in a single pulse and not on average power density. The weight of evidence of the results of human, animal, and modeling studies supports the thermoelastic expansion theory as the explanation for the RF hearing phenomenon. RF induced sounds involve the perception via bone conduction of thermally generated sound transients, that is, audible sounds are produced by rapid thermal expansion resulting from a calculated temperature rise of only 5 x 10(-6) degrees C in tissue at the threshold level due to absorption of the energy in the RF pulse. The hearing of RF induced sounds at exposure levels many orders of magnitude greater than the hearing threshold is considered to be a biological effect without an accompanying health effect. This conclusion is supported by a comparison of pressure induced in the body by RF pulses to pressure associated with hazardous acoustic energy and clinical ultrasound procedures. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14628312     DOI: 10.1002/bem.10163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  10 in total

1.  State of the art cranial ultrasound imaging in neonates.

Authors:  Ginette M Ecury-Goossen; Fleur A Camfferman; Lara M Leijser; Paul Govaert; Jeroen Dudink
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Workgroup report: base stations and wireless networks-radiofrequency (RF) exposures and health consequences.

Authors:  Peter A Valberg; T Emilie van Deventer; Michael H Repacholi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Bats avoid radar installations: could electromagnetic fields deter bats from colliding with wind turbines?

Authors:  Barry Nicholls; Paul A Racey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Sensing Magnetic Fields with Magnetosensitive Ion Channels.

Authors:  Igor Goychuk
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Can the Microwave Auditory Effect Be "Weaponized"?

Authors:  Kenneth R Foster; David C Garrett; Marvin C Ziskin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-23

6.  Computational modeling investigation of pulsed high peak power microwaves and the potential for traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Amy M Dagro; Justin W Wilkerson; Thaddeus P Thomas; Benjamin T Kalinosky; Jason A Payne
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimetric quantity for electromagnetic fields bioeffects.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The interaction between electromagnetic fields at megahertz, gigahertz and terahertz frequencies with cells, tissues and organisms: risks and potential.

Authors:  Sergii Romanenko; Ryan Begley; Alan R Harvey; Livia Hool; Vincent P Wallace
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Repeated exposure to nanosecond high power pulsed microwaves increases cancer incidence in rat.

Authors:  René de Seze; Carole Poutriquet; Christelle Gamez; Emmanuelle Maillot-Maréchal; Franck Robidel; Anthony Lecomte; Caroline Fonta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Review of Audiovestibular Symptoms Following Exposure to Acoustic and Electromagnetic Energy Outside Conventional Human Hearing.

Authors:  Rory J Lubner; Neil S Kondamuri; Renata M Knoll; Bryan K Ward; Philip D Littlefield; Derek Rodgers; Kalil G Abdullah; Aaron K Remenschneider; Elliott D Kozin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.