Adult patients with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia had no superior treatment outcome to those without t(8;21): a single institution's experience.

Clinical features and treatment outcome of 31 patients over 16 years of age with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were compared with 60 patients without t(8;21). Among 31 patients with t(8;21), 15 patients were classified as AML-M2 and 11 and 5 patients as AML-M4 and M1, respectively. Of these patients, 28 patients (90.3%) achieved complete remission and 22 patients received consolidative treatment: intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC) 11, high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) 6, and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) 5. When compared with patients without t(8;21), we could not demonstrate better treatment outcome for t(8;21) AML [median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) 10.3 and 12.5 months in AML with t(8;21) vs 11.5 and 15.6 months in AML without t(8;21)]. In the t(8;21) AML group, patients who received HDAC consolidation did not show superior treatment outcome to those who received other consolidative treatment [median EFS: IDAC 11.9 months vs HDAC 9.2 months vs allogeneic BMT 38.1 months (P=NS) and median OS: IDAC 17.8 months vs HDAC 12.0 months vs allogeneic BMT 47.3 months (P=NS)]. Similar treatment outcome between patients with and without t(8;21) and non-superior treatment outcome of HDAC consolidative chemotherapy in the t(8;21) AML group in our study is contradictory to previous reports.