Literature DB >> 1462786

Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems.

B Brehmer1.   

Abstract

This paper reviews research on dynamic decision making, i.e., decision making under conditions which require a series of decisions, where the decisions are not independent, where the state of the world changes, both autonomously and as a consequence of the decision maker's actions, and where the decisions have to be made in real time. It is difficult to find useful normative theories for these kinds of decisions, and research thus has to focus on descriptive issues. A general approach, based on control theory, is proposed as a means to organize research in the area. An experimental paradigm for the study of dynamic decision making, that of computer simulated microworlds, is discussed, and two approaches using this paradigm are described: the individual differences approach, typical of German work in the tradition of research on complex problem solving, and the experimental approach. In studies following the former approach, the behaviour of groups differing in performance is compared, either with respect to strategies or with respect to performance on psychological tests. The results show that there are wide interindividual differences in performance, but no stable correlations between performance in microworlds and scores on traditional psychological tests have been found. Experimental research studying the effects of system characteristics, such as complexity and feedback delays, on dynamic decision making has shown that decision performance in dynamic tasks is strongly affected by feedback delays and whether or not the decisions have side effects. Although neither approach has led to any well-developed theory of dynamic decision making so far, the results nevertheless indicate that we are now able to produce highly reliable experimental results in the laboratory, results that agree with those found in field studies of dynamic decision making. This shows that an important first step towards a better understanding of these phenomena has been taken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1462786     DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(92)90019-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  19 in total

1.  An empirical study of the impact of complexity on participation in horserace betting.

Authors:  J E Johnson; A C Bruce
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  1997

2.  Towards a simulation environment for modeling of local influenza outbreaks.

Authors:  Toomas Timpka; Magnus Morin; Johan Jenvald; Henrik Eriksson; Elin Gursky
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

3.  Public and health professionals' misconceptions about the dynamics of body weight gain/loss.

Authors:  Tarek Abdel-Hamid; Felix Ankel; Michele Battle-Fisher; Bryan Gibson; Gilberto Gonzalez-Parra; Mohammad Jalali; Kirsikka Kaipainen; Nishan Kalupahana; Ozge Karanfil; Achla Marathe; Brian Martinson; Karma McKelvey; Suptendra Nath Sarbadhikari; Stephen Pintauro; Patrick Poucheret; Nicolaas Pronk; Ying Qian; Edward Sazonov; Kim Van Oorschot; Akshay Venkitasubramanian; Philip Murphy
Journal:  Syst Dyn Rev       Date:  2014 January-June

4.  Using mutual information to capture major concerns of postural control in a tossing activity.

Authors:  Harshvardhan Gazula; Chien-Chi Chang; Ming-Lun Lu; Simon M Hsiang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Getting it right generally, but not precisely: learning the relation between multiple inputs and outputs.

Authors:  Robert C Mathews; Jonathan Tall; Sean M Lane; Ron Sun
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

6.  Causal structure learning over time: observations and interventions.

Authors:  Benjamin M Rottman; Frank C Keil
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Criteria-Based Return to Sport Decision-Making Following Lateral Ankle Sprain Injury: a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Bruno Tassignon; Jo Verschueren; Eamonn Delahunt; Michelle Smith; Bill Vicenzino; Evert Verhagen; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  To react or not to react? Intrinsic stochasticity of human control in virtual stick balancing.

Authors:  Arkady Zgonnikov; Ihor Lubashevsky; Shigeru Kanemoto; Toru Miyazawa; Takashi Suzuki
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Learning in Noise: Dynamic Decision-Making in a Variable Environment.

Authors:  Todd M Gureckis; Bradley C Love
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.223

10.  A canonical theory of dynamic decision-making.

Authors:  John Fox; Richard P Cooper; David W Glasspool
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.