Literature DB >> 14626405

Laparoscopic repair of a uteroperitoneal fistula.

M T Jacobson1, J Osias, A Velasco, R Charles, C Nezhat.   

Abstract

Repairs of pelvic fistulas using abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic approaches have been described. In the present case report, we describe our experience with the laparoscopic repair of a uteroperitoneal fistula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14626405      PMCID: PMC3021339     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JSLS        ISSN: 1086-8089            Impact factor:   2.172


INTRODUCTION

This is a case report describing the laparoscopic repair of a uteroperitoneal fistula. This patient presented 6 months following an uncomplicated Cesarean delivery with pelvic pain. As part of her diagnostic workup, she underwent a laparoscopy and lysis of adhesions. One month later, her symptoms did not improve and she had a repeat laparoscopy and lysis of adhesions. After a year, she presented with left-sided pelvic pain, heavy menses, dysmenorrhea, and dyschezia. She was referred to where a comprehensive evaluation was performed. At laparoscopy, she was found to have dense adhesions and an endometriotic nodule between the bladder and the lower uterine segment. Following an extensive dissection, a uteroperitoneal fistula was identified and confirmed hysteroscopically. The fistulous tract was successfully repaired laparoscopically. Postopera-tively, the patient experienced complete resolution of her pain. She conceived 10 months later and had an uncomplicated repeat Cesarean delivery.

CASE REPORT

A healthy 24-year-old female, gravida 2, para 2-0-0-2 with no prior surgeries underwent an uncomplicated primary low transverse Cesarean delivery for fetal intolerance of labor and failure to progress. Six months later, she presented to her physician complaining of progressive pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and dysmenorrhea. She did not respond to medical therapy, including narcotics and an empiric course of antibiotic therapy. She underwent an operative laparoscopy and adhesiolysis. The anterior aspect of the uterus was found to be adherent to the anterior abdominal wall up to the level of the fundus. Her symptoms did not improve, and a second laparoscopy and adhesiolysis were performed a month later with some improvement in her symptomatology. After 1 year, she reported persistent pelvic pain, abnormal bleeding, and dysmenorrhea; she was treated empirically with a course of Depot-Lupron with some improvement. She was then referred to our center for further evaluation. A pelvic examination revealed adenexal tenderness. The pelvic ultrasound, urinalysis, and complete blood count were within normal limits. The urine pregnancy test was negative. The patient was anxious to conceive and after extensive counseling elected to proceed with surgery. Hysteroscopy initially revealed a normal uterine cavity with no evidence of leiomyomata or polyps. At laparoscopy, she had superficial implants of endometriosis on the right ovarian cortex and a fibrotic endometriotic nodule in the right pararectal space, which was excised by using a CO2 laser. She had dense adhesions in the anterior cul-de-sac and an endometriotic nodule between the anterior lower uterine segment and the bladder. A 1-cm defect was identified between the uterus and the peritoneum at the level of the anterior lower uterine segment. This defect was also clearly visible on repeat hysteroscopy. To facilitate the development of the bladder flap, the superior vesical artery was desiccated and incised on the left. The bladder was mobilized inferiorly to the level of the vagina. No bleeding occurred from the edges of the fistulous tract, and these findings were felt to be consistent with a uteroperitoneal fistula rather than with an acute uterine perforation. Under hysteroscopic guidance, the boundaries of the fistula were clearly demarcated. Using the laparoscopic approach, the edges of the fistula were excised with the CO2 laser and the fresh tissue margins were re-approximated with 2 interrupted sutures of 2-0 Vicryl. A cystoscopy revealed mild interstitial cystitis. No evidence was present of a vesicouterine fistula, cystotomy, or bladder endometriosis. The patient had an uncomplicated intraoperative and postoperative course. She experienced complete resolution of her symptoms and conceived 10 months following her repair. She had an uncomplicated repeat Cesarean delivery and continues to do well.

DISCUSSION

Uteroperitoneal fistulas are extremely rare. In developing countries, fistulas are generally due to obstetrical injury from prolonged, obstructed labor. However, in the United States, pelvic fistulas are relatively uncommon; vesicovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas have been more frequently described.[1,2] Approximately 75% of vesicovaginal fistulas are a complication of hysterectomy.[3] Other risk factors include carcinoma, radiation, endometriosis, vascular disease, pelvic infection, obesity, smoking, and inflammatory bowel disease. Inadequate healing of the lower uterine segment incision at the time of her prior Cesarean delivery may have caused this patient's uteroperitoneal fistula. It may also have been the result of an undiagnosed uterine perforation during one of her previous endoscopies. The fistula was identified following an extensive lysis of an adhesion to separate the uterus from its dense attachment to the bladder. The appearance of epithelialized tissue with no bleeding from the tissue margins was most consistent with a uteroperitoneal fistula rather than with an acute uterine perforation. Advanced laparoscopy has transformed the field of gynecologic surgery. Complex surgical procedures once considered possible only via laparotomy are now being routinely performed laparoscopically. The surgical approach to the management of fistulas depends on the nature of the fistulous tract, and the surgeon's experience and skill. Laparoscopic repair of vesicovaginal fistulas has previously been reported in the literature.[4-8] In the present case, we describe the successful laparoscopic repair of a uteroperitoneal fistula in a patient with endometriosis and a history of an uncomplicated Cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSION

The range of procedures being performed laparoscopically continues to expand. Our initial experience suggests that in experienced hands, laparoscopy can be used for the management of a uteroperitoneal fistula.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Bladder injuries during total laparoscopic hysterectomy: diagnosis, management, and prevention.

Authors:  C Chapron; J B Dubuisson; Y Ansquer; S S Gregorakis; P Morice; M Zerbib
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  1995

2.  Laparoscopic treatment of type IV rectovaginal fistula.

Authors:  C H Nezhat; J A Bastidas; E Pennington; F R Nezhat; F Raga; C R Nezhat
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1998-08

3.  Laparoscopic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula using an omental J flap.

Authors:  P von Theobald; P Hamel; W Febbraro
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-11

4.  Laparoscopic management of recurrent vesicovaginal fistula.

Authors:  J R Miklos; C Sobolewski; V Lucente
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1999

5.  Laparoscopic resection of high rectovaginal fistula with intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis and omentoplasty.

Authors:  W Schwenk; B Böhm; K Gründel; J Müller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula: a case report.

Authors:  C H Nezhat; F Nezhat; C Nezhat; H Rottenberg
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Laparoscopic repair of cholecystoduodenal fistulae.

Authors:  A Sharma; M Sullivan; H English; R Foley
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1994-12
  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Symptomatic Chronic Uterine Dehiscence: A Different Approach, Non-surgical Successful Closure.

Authors:  Laxmi V Baxi; Jodi P Lerner; Jenny Nova
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-11-19

2.  Anterior uterine wall: normal and abnormal CT and MRI findings after cesarean section.

Authors:  Ali Devrim Karaosmanoğlu; Altan Güneş; Mustafa Nasuh Özmen; Deniz Akata
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  The effect of laparoscopic resection of large niches in the uterine caesarean scar on symptoms, ultrasound findings and quality of life: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ajmw Vervoort; J Vissers; Wjk Hehenkamp; Ham Brölmann; Jaf Huirne
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Combined Medical and Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgical Approach to the Treatment and Repair of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies.

Authors:  Eva Hoffmann; Sevan Vahanian; Vanessa T Martinelli; Martin Chavez; Michael Mesbah; Farr R Nezhat
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Biography of Camran Nezhat, MD, FACOG, FACS.

Authors:  James E Carter
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 6.  Scar Tissue after a Cesarean Section-The Management of Different Complications in Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Aleksandra Stupak; Adrianna Kondracka; Agnieszka Fronczek; Anna Kwaśniewska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Laparoscopic Fluorescence Guided Detection of Uterine Niche-The Next Step in Surgical Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Harald Krentel; Lisa-Kathrin Lauterbach; Georgios Mavrogiannis; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Stavros Karampelas; Georges Salem Wehbe; Laurent de Landsheere; Dominique A Badr; Linda Tebache; Michelle Nisolle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.