Literature DB >> 14626298

Macromolecular contrast medium (feruglose) versus small molecular contrast medium (gadopentetate) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Heike E Daldrup-Link1, Anna Kaiser, Thomas Helbich, Martin Werner, Atle Bjørnerud, Thomas M Link, Ernst J Rummeny.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance of the blood pool agent feruglose and the standard extracellular contrast agent gadopentetate in their abilities to differentiate benign and malignant breast tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen women, aged 35-77 years (mean, 55 years), with 19 breast lesions underwent dynamic fast field echo 14/1/30 degrees (TR/TE/alpha) magnetic resonance imaging of the breast after bolus injection of feruglose (Clariscan; Amersham Health, Amersham, UK: dose, 2 mg Fe/kg) and an additional, comparative gadopentetate (dose, 0.2 mmol gadolinium/kg)-enhanced fast field echo 10/4/30 degrees (TR/TE/alpha) magnetic resonance study within 1-11 days (mean, 4.8 days) before or after the feruglose study. All breast tumors were surgically excised within 1-6 days (mean, 2.5 days) after completion of the magnetic resonance studies. Data were analyzed by measuring quantitative enhancement data and qualitatively by categorizations of the shape of the tumor enhancement curves. Group differences between quantitative data of the two contrast agents and between benign and malignant tumors were evaluated using a two-tailed paired-sample t test. Differences in curve type distribution between benign and malignant tumors were tested with the chi2 test.
RESULTS: Histopathology showed a spectrum of 10 benign and nine malignant breast lesions: five mastopathies, two fibroadenomas, two chronic inflammations, and one papillomatosis, as well as five invasive ductal carcinomas and four invasive lobular carcinomas. Substantial differences were observed between feruglose- and gadopentetate-enhanced images: the mean tumor deltaSI(%) peak enhancement and wash-in rate were significantly higher for gadopentetate- as compared with feruglose-enhanced images (P < .05). Using either contrast agent, morphologic enhancement characteristics showed a considerable overlap between benign and malignant breast lesions. However, the kinetic enhancement profiles of benign and malignant lesions were significantly different based on feruglose-enhanced data (chi2 = 9.017; P = .0027) but not gadopentetate-enhanced data (chi2 = 2.239; P = .3264).
CONCLUSION: Compared with gadopentetate, the new blood pool agent feruglose provided an improved characterization of the evaluated breast lesions; however, at the cost of weaker overall tumor enhancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14626298     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00248-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  9 in total

1.  In vivo monitoring of angiogenesis inhibitory treatment effects by dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography in a xenograft tumor model.

Authors:  Hans-Juergen Raatschen; Yanjun Fu; Robert C Brasch; Hubertus Pietsch; David M Shames; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 2.  MR angiography with blood pool contrast agents.

Authors:  Jens Bremerich; Deniz Bilecen; Peter Reimer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Speeding up PET/MR for cancer staging of children and young adults.

Authors:  Maryam Aghighi; Laura Jean Pisani; Ziyan Sun; Christopher Klenk; Himani Madnawat; Sandra Luna Fineman; Ranjana Advani; Rie Von Eyben; Daniel Owen; Andrew Quon; Michael Moseley; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Detection of Stem Cell Transplant Rejection with Ferumoxytol MR Imaging: Correlation of MR Imaging Findings with Those at Intravital Microscopy.

Authors:  Heike E Daldrup-Link; Carmel Chan; Olga Lenkov; Seyedmeghdad Taghavigarmestani; Toktam Nazekati; Hossein Nejadnik; Fanny Chapelin; Aman Khurana; Xinming Tong; Fan Yang; Laura Pisani; Michael Longaker; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Biodistribution of newly synthesized PHEA-based polymer-coated SPION in Sprague Dawley rats as magnetic resonance contrast agent.

Authors:  Junsung Park; Wonkyung Cho; Hee Jun Park; Kwang-Ho Cha; Dae-Chul Ha; Youn-Woong Choi; Ha-Young Lee; Sun-Hang Cho; Sung-Joo Hwang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-10-31

6.  MR Imaging of Stem Cell Transplants in Arthritic Joints.

Authors:  Heike E Daldrup-Link; Hossein Nejadnik
Journal:  J Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2014-02-07

Review 7.  Ten Things You Might Not Know about Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  How to stop using gadolinium chelates for magnetic resonance imaging: clinical-translational experiences with ferumoxytol.

Authors:  Heike E Daldrup-Link; Ashok J Theruvath; Ali Rashidi; Michael Iv; Robbie G Majzner; Sheri L Spunt; Stuart Goodman; Michael Moseley
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-05-27

9.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) in Preclinical Studies of Antivascular Treatments.

Authors:  Thomas Nielsen; Thomas Wittenborn; Michael R Horsman
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.321

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.