Literature DB >> 14625856

Comparison of PDQuest and Progenesis software packages in the analysis of two-dimensional electrophoresis gels.

Arsi T Rosengren1, Jussi M Salmi, Tero Aittokallio, Jan Westerholm, Riitta Lahesmaa, Tuula A Nyman, Olli S Nevalainen.   

Abstract

Efficient analysis of protein expression by using two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) data relies on the use of automated image processing techniques. The overall success of this research depends critically on the accuracy and the reliability of the analysis software. In addition, the software has a profound effect on the interpretation of the results obtained, and the amount of user intervention demanded during the analysis. The choice of analysis software that best meets specific needs is therefore of interest to the research laboratory. In this paper we compare two advanced analysis software packages, PDQuest and Progenesis. Their evaluation is based on quantitative tests at three different levels of standard 2-DE analysis: spot detection, gel matching and spot quantitation. As test materials we use three gel sets previously used in a similar comparison of Z3 and Melanie, and three sets of gels from our own research. It was observed that the quality of the test gels critically influences the spot detection and gel matching results. Both packages were sensitive to the parameter or filter settings with respect to the tendency of finding true positive and false positive spots. Quantitation results were very accurate for both analysis software packages.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14625856     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200300544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  9 in total

Review 1.  Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in bacterial proteomics.

Authors:  Shirly O T Curreem; Rory M Watt; Susanna K P Lau; Patrick C Y Woo
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 14.870

Review 2.  Toward the complete proteome of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.

Authors:  Liyan Gao; Jinlong Wang; Haitao Ge; Longfa Fang; Yuanya Zhang; Xiahe Huang; Yingchun Wang
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Plant systems biology: insights, advances and challenges.

Authors:  Bhavisha P Sheth; Vrinda S Thaker
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Mutant prion protein expression is associated with an alteration of the Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha (GDI)/Rab11 pathway.

Authors:  Tania Massignan; Emiliano Biasini; Eliana Lauranzano; Pietro Veglianese; Mauro Pignataro; Luana Fioriti; David A Harris; Mario Salmona; Roberto Chiesa; Valentina Bonetto
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Highlights on the capacities of "Gel-based" proteomics.

Authors:  François Chevalier
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Feature detection techniques for preprocessing proteomic data.

Authors:  Kimberly F Sellers; Jeffrey C Miecznikowski
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-05-05

7.  Ocular proteomics with emphasis on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Bent Honoré; Henrik Vorum; Nakul Mandal; Steffen Heegaard; Jan Ulrik Prause
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.244

8.  A proteomic view into infection of greyback canegrubs (Dermolepida albohirtum) by Metarhizium anisopliae.

Authors:  Nirupama Shoby Manalil; Valentino S Junior Te'o; Kathy Braithwaite; Stevens Brumbley; Peter Samson; K M Helena Nevalainen
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.886

9.  Pre-analytical stability of the plasma proteomes based on the storage temperature.

Authors:  Sara Pasella; Angela Baralla; Elisabetta Canu; Sara Pinna; James Vaupel; Marta Deiana; Claudio Franceschi; Giovannella Baggio; Angelo Zinellu; Salvatore Sotgia; Giuseppe Castaldo; Ciriaco Carru; Luca Deiana
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.480

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.