Literature DB >> 14625742

Analysis of 153 deaths after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: room for improvement?

A M Thompson1, D J Wright, W Murray, G L Ritchie, H D Burton, P A Stonebridge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is a widely used procedure that is generally considered to be safe.
METHODS: Of a total of 33,854 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during 1999 under the care of surgeons in Scotland, 153 (0.004%) died. We reviewed the case notes of these 153 patients.
RESULTS: Death was directly related to endoscopy in 20 of 153 cases (13%), most commonly due to gastrointestinal perforation or acute pancreatitis. Ninety-one percent (139) of the patients undergoing endoscopy were American Society of Anesthesiologists grades (ASA) 3-5, and 88% received intravenous sedation; an anesthetist was present in 31 cases (20%). Oxygen was administered to 45% of patients during the endoscopy. In 56% of the procedures, there was monitoring of electrocardiograms (ECG), pulse oximetry, or blood pressure readings.
CONCLUSIONS: Although deaths after endoscopy may be unavoidable, clinicians undertaking upper GI endoscopy or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in ASA 3-5 patients should provide oxygen therapy and cardiovascular monitoring, and keep accurate records. The involvement of an anesthetist in airway management and the administration of intravenous sedation should be actively considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14625742     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9069-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Asleep on the job: sedation and monitoring during endoscopy.

Authors:  R McCloy
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1992

3.  Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods.

Authors:  M A Quine; G D Bell; R F McCloy; J E Charlton; H B Devlin; A Hopkins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Complications of fiberoptic gastrointestinal endoscopy--five years' experience in a central hospital.

Authors:  O Reiertsen; J Skjøtø; C D Jacobsen; A R Rosseland
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  M L Freeman; J A DiSario; D B Nelson; M B Fennerty; J G Lee; D J Bjorkman; C S Overby; J Aas; M E Ryan; G S Bochna; M J Shaw; H W Snady; R V Erickson; J P Moore; J P Roel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Safety of fibreoptic endoscopy: analysis of cardiorespiratory events.

Authors:  A M Thompson; K G Park; F Kerr; A Munro
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Endotracheal intubation for airway protection during endoscopy for severe upper GI hemorrhage.

Authors:  Stephen J Rudolph; Brian K Landsverk; Martin L Freeman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predictors of outcome.

Authors:  G Larson; T Schmidt; J Gott; S Bond; C A O'Connor; J D Richardson
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Intravenous midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a study of 800 consecutive cases relating dose to age and sex of patient.

Authors:  G D Bell; G P Spickett; P A Reeve; A Morden; R F Logan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Selection of patients for early discharge or outpatient care after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage.

Authors:  T A Rockall; R F Logan; H B Devlin; T C Northfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-27       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  14 in total

1.  Double balloon enteroscopy examinations in general anesthesia.

Authors:  Laszlo Zubek; Lena Szabo; Peter Laszlo Lakatos; Janos Papp; Janos Gal; Gabor Elo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Building a framework for trust: critical event analysis of deaths in surgical care.

Authors:  A M Thompson; P A Stonebridge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-14

3.  Safety and prevention of complications in endoscopic sedation.

Authors:  Chang Hwan Choi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Occurrence and care of an obese patient during a serious adverse event with propofol for an endoscopy procedure.

Authors:  Michele Carron; Ulderico Freo; Carlo Ori
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy mortality: the medical examiner's perspective.

Authors:  Stephen J deRoux; Anthony Sgarlato
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 6.  How best to approach endoscopic sedation?

Authors:  Michaela Müller; Till Wehrmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Post-procedure elevated amylase and lipase levels after double-balloon enteroscopy: relations with the double-balloon technique.

Authors:  Cengiz Pata; Umit Akyüz; Yusuf Erzin; Nilgun Mutlu; Arzu Mercan; Ahmet Dirican
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing real versus placebo acupuncture to improve tolerance of diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy without sedation: a study protocol.

Authors:  P Knebel; K Schwan; T Bruckner; Cm Seiler; K Plaschke; K Streitberger; A Schaible; C Bopp
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Recent advances in using propofol by non-anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Gang Tan; Michael G Irwin
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-11-11

10.  Comparison of Propofol, Propofol-Remifentanil, and Propofol-Fentanyl Administrations with Each Other Used for the Sedation of Patients to Undergo ERCP.

Authors:  Candan Haytural; Bahar Aydınlı; Berna Demir; Elif Bozkurt; Erkan Parlak; Selçuk Dişibeyaz; Ahmet Saraç; Ayşegül Özgök; Dilek Kazancı
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.