Literature DB >> 14625114

AED use in businesses, public facilities and homes by minimally trained first responders.

Dawn B Jorgenson1, Teresa Skarr, James K Russell, David E Snyder, Karen Uhrbrock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) have become increasingly available outside of the Emergency Medical Systems (EMS) community to treat sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). We sought to study the use of AEDs in the home, businesses and other public settings by minimally trained first responders. The frequency of AED use, type of training offered to first responders, and outcomes of AED use were investigated. In addition, minimally trained responders were asked if they had encountered any safety problems associated with the AED.
METHODS: We conducted a telephone survey of businesses and public facilities (2683) and homes (145) owning at least one AED for at least 12 months. Use was defined as an AED taken to a medical emergency thought to be a SCA, regardless of whether the AED was applied to the patient or identified a shockable rhythm.
RESULTS: Of owners that participated in the survey, 13% (209/1581) of businesses and 5% (4/73) of homes had responded with the AED to a suspected cardiac arrest. Ninety-five percent of the businesses/public facilities offered training that specifically covered AED use. The rate of use for the AEDs was highest in residential buildings, public places, malls and recreational facilities with an overall usage rate of 11.6% per year. In-depth interviews were conducted with lay responders who had used the AED in a suspected cardiac arrest. In the four cases where the AED was used solely by a lay responder, all four patients survived to hospital admission and two were known to be discharged from the hospital. There were no reports of injury or harm.
CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates that AEDs purchased by businesses and homes were frequently taken to suspected cardiac arrests. Lay responders were able to successfully use the AEDs in emergency situations. Further, there were no reports of harm or injury to the operators, bystanders or patients from lay responder use of the AEDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14625114     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00214-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  6 in total

Review 1.  Automated external defibrillators and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death among children and adolescents.

Authors:  Joshua Kovach; Stuart Berger
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Cost-effectiveness of in-home automated external defibrillators for individuals at increased risk of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Sandeep Vijan; David Katz; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Overcoming Spatial and Temporal Barriers to Public Access Defibrillators Via Optimization.

Authors:  Christopher L F Sun; Derya Demirtas; Steven C Brooks; Laurie J Morrison; Timothy C Y Chan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 5.  Ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation.

Authors:  P Jones; N Lodé
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  A first city-wide early defibrillation project in a German city: 5-year results of the Bochum against sudden cardiac arrest study.

Authors:  Christoph Hanefeld
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.953

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.