Literature DB >> 14625109

Defibrillation waveform and post-shock rhythm in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.

John Carpenter1, Thomas D Rea, John A Murray, Peter J Kudenchuk, Mickey S Eisenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of the defibrillation waveform on the evolving post-shock cardiac rhythm is uncertain. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate cardiac rhythms following the first defibrillation shock, comparing biphasic truncated exponential (BTE), monophasic damped sinusoidal (MDS), and monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveforms in patients experiencing out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest (OHCA).
METHODS: We reviewed the automated external defibrillator (AED) and emergency medical services (EMS) records of 366 patients who suffered OHCA and were treated with defibrillation shocks by first-tier emergency responders between 1 January 1999 and 31 August 2002 in King County, Washington. The post first shock rhythms were determined at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 s and compared according to defibrillation waveform.
RESULTS: The MDS and BTE waveforms were associated with significantly higher frequency of defibrillation than the MTE waveform, though only the BTE association persisted to 30 and 60 s. No difference in defibrillation rates was detected between MDS and BTE waveforms. By 60 s, an organized rhythm was present in a greater proportion for BTE (40.0%) compared with MDS (25.4%, P=0.01) or MTE (26.5%, P=0.07).
CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort investigation, MDS and BTE waveforms had higher first shock defibrillation rates than the MTE waveform, while patients treated with the BTE waveform were more likely to develop an organized rhythm within 60 s of the initial shock. The results of this investigation, however, do not provide evidence that these surrogate advantages are important for improving survival. Additional investigation is needed to improve the understanding of the role of waveform and its potential interaction with other clinical factors in order to optimize survival in OHCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14625109     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00183-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  8 in total

Review 1.  Theory and practice of defibrillation: (2) defibrillation for ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  A A J Adgey; M S Spence; S J Walsh
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Influence of electrophysiological heterogeneity on electrical stimulation in healthy and failing human hearts.

Authors:  I M Graf; G Seemann; D L Weiss; O Dössel
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Inter-association Task Force recommendations on emergency preparedness and management of sudden cardiac arrest in high school and college athletic programs: a consensus statement.

Authors:  Jonathan A Drezner; Ron W Courson; William O Roberts; Vincent N Mosesso; Mark S Link; Barry J Maron
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  A framework of current based defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of biphasic truncated exponential waveform in rabbits.

Authors:  Weiming Li; Jingru Li; Liang Wei; Jianjie Wang; Li Peng; Juan Wang; Changlin Yin; Yongqin Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  [Adult advanced life support].

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.826

6.  A simulation study of the reaction of human heart to biphasic electrical shocks.

Authors:  Lulia M Popp; Gunnar Seemann; Olaf Dössel
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Significant changes in resuscitation guidelines: current and future recommendations?

Authors:  Walter G J Kloeck
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.167

8.  Return of spontaneous circulation and long-term survival according to feedback provided by automated external defibrillators.

Authors:  M Agerskov; M B Hansen; A M Nielsen; T P Møller; M Wissenberg; L S Rasmussen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.105

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.