Literature DB >> 14624714

Additional value of whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of distant metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Sigrid G Stroobants1, Isabelle D'Hoore, Christophe Dooms, Paul R De Leyn, Patrick J Dupont, Walter De Wever, Tjibbe De Groot, Johny A Verschakelen, Luc A Mortelmans, Johan F Vansteenkiste.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the additional value of whole-body positron emission tomography (WB-PET) in the distant staging of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One hundred forty-four patients with NSCLC in whom conventional staging (CS) was negative or equivocal for metastases, and who underwent WB-PET as part of their initial work-up, were retrospectively analyzed. Conventional staging consisted of thoracic computed tomography (CT), upper abdominal ultrasound and/or CT, and bone scintigraphy or brain CT on indication. Final M stage was based on histology, additional imaging, or follow-up of = 18 months. An additional lesion suspect for metastasis was found on WB-PET in 11 patients. This was true positive in 7 (3 bone, 1 retroperitoneal lymph nodes, 1 lung, and 2 asymptomatic coexisting colorectal cancer) and false positive in 4 patients (3 bowel, 1 breast). Twenty-four lesions in 21 patients remained equivocal after CS. Whole- body PET correctly characterized 20 lesions in 18 patients as true positive (n = 1) or true negative (n = 19). Whole-body PET was false positive in one patient (adrenal adenoma) and false negative in 2 patients (2 bone, 1 lung lesion). Despite negative results of modern CS and WB-PET, 16 of 86 patients (19%) who underwent a curative resection, experienced a systemic relapse. After thorough modern CS, WB-PET correctly detected additional distant malignant lesions in only 5% of the patients, while the combined staging strategy probably still misses micrometastatic disease in one fifth of the patients. The most important contribution of WB-PET was its ability to exclude malignancy in the majority of distant lesions with equivocal CS.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 14624714     DOI: 10.3816/clc.2003.n.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer        ISSN: 1525-7304            Impact factor:   4.785


  9 in total

Review 1.  Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in lung cancer.

Authors:  Ilgin Sahiner; Gulin Ucmak Vural
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-06

2.  Evaluation of a cumulative SUV-volume histogram method for parameterizing heterogeneous intratumoural FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer PET studies.

Authors:  Floris H P van Velden; Patsuree Cheebsumon; Maqsood Yaqub; Egbert F Smit; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET-CT in the initial evaluation of lung cancer.

Authors:  Poul Henning Madsen; Paw Christian Holdgaard; Janne Buck Christensen; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Relapse in resected lung cancer revisited: does intensified follow up really matter? A prospective study.

Authors:  Dragan Subotic; Dragan Mandaric; Gordana Radosavljevic; Jelena Stojsic; Milan Gajic; Maja Ercegovac
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Prognostic value of volumetric parameters of (18)F-FDG PET in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Im; Kyoungjune Pak; Gi Jeong Cheon; Keon Wook Kang; Seong-Jang Kim; In-Joo Kim; June-Key Chung; E Edmund Kim; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Volume-based assessment by (18)F-FDG PET/CT predicts survival in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Seung Hyup Hyun; Hee Kyung Ahn; Hojoong Kim; Myung-Ju Ahn; Keunchil Park; Yong Chan Ahn; Jhingook Kim; Young Mog Shim; Joon Young Choi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Effects of rigid and non-rigid image registration on test-retest variability of quantitative [18F]FDG PET/CT studies.

Authors:  Floris Hp van Velden; Paul van Beers; Johan Nuyts; Linda M Velasquez; Wendy Hayes; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard; Dirk Loeckx
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.138

8.  Relation between tumor FDG uptake and hematologic prognostic indicators in stage I lung cancer patients following curative resection.

Authors:  Eugene Jeong; Seung Hyup Hyun; Seung Hwan Moon; Young Seok Cho; Byung-Tae Kim; Kyung-Han Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The prognostic value of tumor/lymph node standardized uptake value max ratio and correlation with hematologic parameters in stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yusuf Açikgoz; Fatih Gurler; Bediz Kurt Inci; Yakup Ergun; Gokhan Ucar; Merve Dirikoc; Selin Akturk Esen; Berna Okudan Tekin; Oznur Bal; Mutlu Dogan; Dogan Uncu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.