Literature DB >> 14624434

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale associated with paradoxical embolism using the amplatzer PFO occluder: initial and intermediate-term results of the U.S. multicenter clinical trial.

Thomas E Hong1, David Thaler, James Brorson, Mary Heitschmidt, Ziyad M Hijazi.   

Abstract

Closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with presumed paradoxical emboli. We report the immediate and mid-term results of the phase 1 U.S. Multicenter Clinical Trial of patients who underwent transcatheter PFO closure for paradoxical embolism using the new Amplatzer PFO device. Fifty patients (28 male/22 female) underwent catheter closure of their PFOs at a mean age of 41 +/- 11 years. Thirty-six patients had ischemic stroke, 10 had transient ischemic attack, and 4 had peripheral embolism. Seventeen patients had atrial septal aneurysm. The implantation procedure was successful in 49/49 patients; one patient did not have a PFO. Complete closure was seen immediately after the procedure in 26/49 patients; 17 had minimal residual shunt, 4 had moderate and 2 had large residual shunts. The median fluoroscopy time was 10.5 min (2.8-43 min). There were no complications related to the device. One patient developed an arteriovenous fistula at the catheter site requiring surgical repair. At a mean follow-up interval of 16.5 +/- 7.2 months, there were no deaths or recurrent neurological or peripheral embolic events. Eight patients reported an episode of dizziness or palpitations (four of them within 18 days of the procedure). No episodes of atrial dysrhythmias were noted. Contrast bubble study at last follow-up documented complete closure in 45/48 patients; one patient had minimal, one had moderate residual shunt, and one had a large shunt. One patient was lost to follow-up. We conclude that catheter closure of PFO associated with stroke/transient ischemic attack or peripheral embolism using the new Amplatzer PFO device is a safe and effective method in preventing recurrence of such episodes. Randomized clinical trials comparing device closure versus continued medical therapy are underway. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14624434     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  7 in total

Review 1.  Embolization and transcatheter retrieval of coils and devices.

Authors:  C A Tan; D S Levi; J W Moore
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  Patent foramen ovale: anatomy, outcomes, and closure.

Authors:  Patrick A Calvert; Bushra S Rana; Anna C Kydd; Leonard M Shapiro
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Patent foramen ovale closure and medical treatments for secondary stroke prevention: a systematic review of observational and randomized evidence.

Authors:  Georgios D Kitsios; Issa J Dahabreh; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; David E Thaler; David M Kent
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Closure of patent foramen ovale for cryptogenic stroke patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Xuan Niu; Guang Ou-Yang; Peng-Fei Yan; Shu-Lan Huang; Zhen-Tao Zhang; Zhao-Hui Zhang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database for adverse events involving Amplatzer septal occluder devices and comparison with the Society of Thoracic Surgery congenital cardiac surgery database.

Authors:  Daniel J DiBardino; Doff B McElhinney; Aditya K Kaza; John E Mayer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  EC-IC bypass: the failure of a clinical trial? Applicability to PFO closure trials.

Authors:  Nancy Futrell
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-06

Review 7.  Closure versus medical therapy for preventing recurrent stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale and a history of cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Jie Li; Junfeng Liu; Ming Liu; Shihong Zhang; Zilong Hao; Jing Zhang; Canfei Zhang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.