Literature DB >> 14624266

Predictive validity despite social desirability: evidence for the robustness of self-report among offenders.

Jeremy F Mills1, Wagdy Loza, Dary G Kroner.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many professionals believe that self-report questionnaires used to predict recidivism have a low validity. The aim of the present study was to investigate the assumption that the validity of self-report is vulnerable to self-presentation biases in offender samples.
METHOD: The participants consisted of 124 male offenders who volunteered to complete the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ).
RESULTS: Lower scores on measures of social desirability were significantly associated with higher levels of risk (as measured by self-report and a rated actuarial instrument) and a higher likelihood to re-offend. Further, stepwise regression analysis revealed that social desirability added significantly unique variance in the prediction of violent recidivism. DISCUSSION: The authors propose that impression management may be an enduring person-based characteristic within an offender sample rather than a situationally determined response style. The variance associated with this characterological information is proposed to be the source of the unique predictive variance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14624266     DOI: 10.1002/cbm.536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crim Behav Ment Health        ISSN: 0957-9664


  5 in total

1.  Readiness to change and gender: Moderators of the relationship between social desirability and college drinking.

Authors:  Dawn W Foster
Journal:  J Alcohol Drug Depend       Date:  2013

2.  On the Practical Use of Immersive Virtual Reality for Rehabilitation of Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators in Prison.

Authors:  Nicolas Barnes; Maria V Sanchez-Vives; Tania Johnston
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Psychotic-like experiences and interpersonal violence in the general population.

Authors:  Ramin Mojtabai
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Risk assessment by client and case manager for shared decision making in outpatient forensic psychiatry.

Authors:  Rob H S van den Brink; Nadine A C Troquete; Harry Beintema; Tamara Mulder; Titus W D P van Os; Robert A Schoevers; Durk Wiersma
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 5.  Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods.

Authors:  Alaa Althubaiti
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-05-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.