Literature DB >> 14624108

Impact of different HIV resistance interpretation by distinct systems on clinical utility of resistance testing.

Andrea De Luca1, Carlo-Federico Perno.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Genotypic assays are widely used tools for determining HIV-1 drug resistance and for guiding treatment. Several systems have been developed to interpret the complex influence of amino acid substitutions in HIV reverse transcriptase or protease on the phenotypic susceptibility or clinical response to the 18 available antiretroviral agents. In this review we analyse both studies comparing interpretations by different systems and studies showing correlation of interpretations with clinical outcome, in order to identify discordance and how this may affect prediction of subsequent therapy outcomes. RECENT
FINDINGS: During the last year, several studies analysing interpretation systems, individually or comparatively, have shown substantial variability of the predicted drug activities and therapeutic outcomes. Discrepant interpretation was detected mostly for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and rarely for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Better correlation with treatment outcome was found with most recently updated systems, while a weaker prediction was found with systems interpreting activity of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors solely on the basis of phenotypic susceptibility. Virological, patient-related and treatment-related factors can all affect the results of systems' clinical validations. Refinement of resistance interpretation is possible by introducing rules derived from genotype-outcomes correlation or, at least for protease inhibitors, genotype-phenotype correlation.
SUMMARY: Papers showing clinical validation of the available interpretation systems are presented with a critical view to help the readers' evaluation of their possible use. There is a need for developing a consensus towards common interpretations. Large clinical and virological databases with quality data will be useful for future improvements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14624108     DOI: 10.1097/00001432-200312000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis        ISSN: 0951-7375            Impact factor:   4.915


  4 in total

1.  Predicting tipranavir and darunavir resistance using genotypic, phenotypic, and virtual phenotypic resistance patterns: an independent cohort analysis of clinical isolates highly resistant to all other protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Annie Talbot; Philip Grant; Jonathan Taylor; Jean-Guy Baril; Tommy Fulisma Liu; Hugues Charest; Bluma Brenner; Michel Roger; Robert Shafer; Régis Cantin; Andrew Zolopa
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Web resources for HIV type 1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation.

Authors:  Tommy F Liu; Robert W Shafer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Genotypic susceptibility scores and HIV type 1 RNA responses in treatment-experienced subjects with HIV type 1 infection.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Anderson; Hongyu Jiang; Xiao Ding; Leslie Petch; Terri Journigan; Susan A Fiscus; Richard Haubrich; David Katzenstein; Ronald Swanstrom; Roy M Gulick
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.205

4.  Clinical evaluation of Rega 8: an updated genotypic interpretation system that significantly predicts HIV-therapy response.

Authors:  Jurgen Vercauteren; Gertjan Beheydt; Mattia Prosperi; Pieter Libin; Stijn Imbrechts; Ricardo Camacho; Bonaventura Clotet; Andrea De Luca; Zehava Grossman; Rolf Kaiser; Anders Sönnerborg; Carlo Torti; Eric Van Wijngaerden; Jean-Claude Schmit; Maurizio Zazzi; Anna-Maria Geretti; Anne-Mieke Vandamme; Kristel Van Laethem
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.