Literature DB >> 14623504

The effect of small peer group continuous quality improvement on the clinical practice of midwives in The Netherlands.

Yvonne Engels1, Nicole Verheijen, Margot Fleuren, Henk Mokkink, Richard Grol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of small group continuous quality improvement (CQI) on the clinical practice of midwives in the Netherlands.
DESIGN: Randomised pre-/post-test (balanced block). INTERVENTION: The CQI groups were assigned to either the set of peer review topics including 'perineal repair' and 'artificial rupture of the membranes (ARM)', or to the set of topics including 'airway aspiration' and 'measuring blood pressure'. The two research groups acted as each other's control group.
SETTING: The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and fifty-five individual midwives practising in primary and secondary care who made up 28 peer groups. MEASUREMENT AND KEY
FINDINGS: Questionnaires were used to collect data on clinical practice prior to the start of the intervention and one year later. Pre- and post-test data were received from 156 respondents. The intervention had a positive effect on adherence to the recommendations with respect to airway aspiration of the baby and measuring blood pressure. For ARM, no difference was found between pre- and post-test adherence to recommendations in the intervention group, while in the control group, the percentage of midwives that adhered to the recommendations decreased in the period between pre- and post-test. No significant effect was found for perineal repair. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Small group CQI had a positive effect on changing clinical practice when the learning of new skills (e.g. learning a new suturing technique) was not necessary. Additional interventions are needed when implementing guidelines that recommend the learning of new skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14623504     DOI: 10.1016/s0266-6138(03)00040-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  4 in total

1.  The effects of peer education on university students' knowledge of breast self-examination and health beliefs.

Authors:  Ayla Akkaş Gürsoy; Cağla Yiğitbaş; Fatma Yilmaz; Hacer Erdöl; Hacer Kobya Bulut; Havva Karadeniz Mumcu; Kiymet Yesilçiçek Calik; Ilknur Kahriman; Sevilay Hintistan; Nesrin Nural
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version.

Authors:  Floortje Vlemmix; Ageeth N Rosman; Margot A H Fleuren; Marlies E B Rijnders; Antje Beuckens; Monique C Haak; Bettina M C Akerboom; Joke M J Bais; Simone M I Kuppens; Dimitri N Papatsonis; Brent C Opmeer; Joris A M van der Post; Ben Willem J Mol; Marjolein Kok
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Effect of audit and feedback with peer review on general practitioners' prescribing and test ordering performance: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J Trietsch; B van Steenkiste; R Grol; B Winkens; H Ulenkate; J Metsemakers; T van der Weijden
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  A qualitative study on midwives' identity and perspectives on the occurrence of disrespect and abuse in Maputo city.

Authors:  Anna Galle; Helma Manaharlal; Sally Griffin; Nafissa Osman; Kristien Roelens; Olivier Degomme
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.