Literature DB >> 14623164

Vaccination with DNA vaccines encoding MPB70 or MPB83 or a MPB70 DNA prime-protein boost does not protect cattle against bovine tuberculosis.

D N Wedlock1, M A Skinner, N A Parlane, H M Vordermeier, R G Hewinson, G W de Lisle, B M Buddle.   

Abstract

SETTING: Bovine tuberculosis is a problem in a number of countries and protection of cattle by vaccination could be an important control strategy.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the ability of DNA vaccines, which express the mycobacterial antigens MPB83 and MPB70 and a DNA prime-protein boost strategy to stimulate immune responses in cattle and protect against bovine tuberculosis.
DESIGN: Groups of cattle (n=10) were vaccinated with MPB83 DNA, MPB70 DNA, or MPB70 DNA followed by MPB70 protein or injected with BCG or control plasmid DNA. Animals were challenged intratracheally with virulent Mycobacterium bovis at 13 weeks and protection assessed 17 weeks later at postmortem.
RESULTS: In contrast to the strong cellular immune responses induced by BCG, the DNA vaccines induced minimal interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) responses. Cattle primed with MPB70 DNA and boosted with MPB70 protein induced a strong antibody response and a weak IFN-gamma response. BCG gave significant reduction in four pathological parameters of disease while the DNA vaccines and MPB70 DNA/protein did not protect animals against challenge with M. bovis. Moreover, cattle vaccinated with MPB70 DNA/protein had a significantly higher proportion of animals with severe lung lesions (>100 lesions) than the MPB70 DNA alone or the control group. Increased bovine PPD-specific IL-4 mRNA expression in cattle, post-challenge, correlated with the presence of tuberculous lung lesions.
CONCLUSION: Vaccination of calves with MPB70 or MPB83 DNA vaccines or with a more immunogenic MPB70 DNA prime-protein boost strategy did not induce protection against bovine tuberculosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14623164     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-9792(03)00055-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)        ISSN: 1472-9792            Impact factor:   3.131


  10 in total

1.  Modulation of the immune response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome spike glycoprotein by gene-based and inactivated virus immunization.

Authors:  Wing-pui Kong; Ling Xu; Konrad Stadler; Jeffrey B Ulmer; Sergio Abrignani; Rino Rappuoli; Gary J Nabel
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Vaccination of cattle with a CpG oligodeoxynucleotide-formulated mycobacterial protein vaccine and Mycobacterium bovis BCG induces levels of protection against bovine tuberculosis superior to those induced by vaccination with BCG alone.

Authors:  D Neil Wedlock; Michel Denis; Margot A Skinner; Jessica Koach; Geoffrey W de Lisle; H Martin Vordermeier; R Glyn Hewinson; Sylvia van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk; Lorne A Babiuk; Rolf Hecker; Bryce M Buddle
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Enhanced protection against bovine tuberculosis after coadministration of Mycobacterium bovis BCG with a Mycobacterial protein vaccine-adjuvant combination but not after coadministration of adjuvant alone.

Authors:  D Neil Wedlock; Michel Denis; Gavin F Painter; Gary D Ainge; H Martin Vordermeier; R Glyn Hewinson; Bryce M Buddle
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2008-03-12

4.  Viral booster vaccines improve Mycobacterium bovis BCG-induced protection against bovine tuberculosis.

Authors:  H Martin Vordermeier; Bernardo Villarreal-Ramos; Paul J Cockle; Martin McAulay; Shelley G Rhodes; Tyler Thacker; Sarah C Gilbert; Helen McShane; Adrian V S Hill; Zhou Xing; R Glyn Hewinson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Prime-boost approaches to tuberculosis vaccine development.

Authors:  Neha Dalmia; Alistair J Ramsay
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.217

6.  Efficacy of a vaccine formula against tuberculosis in cattle.

Authors:  Germinal J Canto Alarcon; Yezenia Rubio Venegas; Luis Bojorquez Narvaez; Oscar E Pizano Martínez; Leticia García Casanova; Susana Sosa Gallegos; Alejandro Nava Vargas; Andrea M Olvera Ramírez; Feliciano Milian Suazo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The Case for Live Attenuated Vaccines against the Neglected Zoonotic Diseases Brucellosis and Bovine Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Aseem Pandey; Ana Cabello; Lavoisier Akoolo; Allison Rice-Ficht; Angela Arenas-Gamboa; David McMurray; Thomas A Ficht; Paul de Figueiredo
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-08-18

8.  Differences in pathogenicity of three animal isolates of Mycobacterium species in a mouse model.

Authors:  Haodi Dong; Yue Lv; Srinand Sreevatsan; Deming Zhao; Xiangmei Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hydrophobic Mycobacterial Antigens Elicit Polyfunctional T Cells in Mycobacterium bovis Immunized Cattle: Association With Protection Against Challenge?

Authors:  Lindert Benedictus; Sabine Steinbach; Thomas Holder; Douwe Bakker; Christina Vrettou; W Ivan Morrison; Martin Vordermeier; Timothy Connelley
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Immune response profiles of calves following vaccination with live BCG and inactivated Mycobacterium bovis vaccine candidates.

Authors:  E M D L van der Heijden; J Chileshe; J C M Vernooij; C Gortazar; R A Juste; I Sevilla; J E Crafford; V P M G Rutten; A L Michel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.