Literature DB >> 14622723

The validity and reliability of pain measures in adults with cancer.

Mark P Jensen1.   

Abstract

To be most useful, clinical trials of cancer pain treatments should use pain measures that are both reliable and valid. A great variety of measures are now available that may be used to assess cancer pain. However, there are not yet any clear guidelines for selecting one or more measures over the others. The purpose of this article is to summarize the evidence concerning the validity and reliability of cancer pain measures. One hundred sixty-four articles were identified that provided psychometric data of pain measures among patients with cancer. The results indicate that commonly used single-item ratings of pain intensity are all valid and adequately reliable as measures of pain intensity, although some scales appear to be easier for patients with cancer to understand and to use than others. Multiple-item measures of pain intensity are reliable, but evidence concerning their validity is lacking. There is a paucity of research examining the psychometric properties of measures of cancer pain interference, pain relief, pain site, the temporal aspects of pain, and pain quality. This lack of evidence limits the conclusions that may be drawn concerning the reliability and validity of these other pain measures. Composite measures that combine ratings of pain intensity and pain interference into a single score appear to be both valid and reliable for describing patient populations, although their usefulness in clinical trials may be limited because they can obscure the contributions of intensity and interference to the total score. Proxy measures of cancer pain (pain ratings made by someone other than the patient) may be useful when patients are not able to provide pain ratings, but they should not be used as replacements for patient ratings when patient self-report measures are available. The discussion includes specific recommendations for selecting from among the available pain measures, as well as recommendations for future research into the assessment of cancer pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14622723     DOI: 10.1054/jpai.2003.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  131 in total

1.  Differences in pain location, intensity, and quality by pain pattern in outpatients with cancer.

Authors:  Srisuda Ngamkham; Janean E Holden; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Impact of pain reported during isometric quadriceps muscle strength testing in people with knee pain: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; Paul W Stratford
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-08-11

3.  Which pain intensity scale from the Brief Pain Inventory correlates most highly with functional interference scores in patients experiencing taxane-induced arthralgia and myalgia?

Authors:  Nicholas Chiu; Liying Zhang; Daniela Gallo-Hershberg; Rebecca Dent; Leonard Chiu; Mark Pasetka; Jenna van Draanen; Ronald Chow; Henry Lam; Sunil Verma; Jordan Stinson; Erica Stacey; Edward Chow; Carlo DeAngelis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Unilateral vs bilateral symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: associations between pain intensity and function.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; Paul W Stratford
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Severe pain during wound care procedures: A cross-sectional study protocol.

Authors:  Catherine A Fiala; Linda I Abbott; Cheryl D Carter; Stephen L Hillis; Jessica S Wolf; Meghan Schuster; Rachel Dulski; Elizabeth A Grice; Barbara A Rakel; Sue E Gardner
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Predictors of the trajectories of self-reported sleep disturbance in men with prostate cancer during and following radiation therapy.

Authors:  Christine Miaskowski; Steven M Paul; Bruce A Cooper; Kathryn Lee; Marylin Dodd; Claudia West; Bradley E Aouizerat; Laura Dunn; Patrick S Swift; William Wara
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Prostate cancer pain management: EAU guidelines on pain management.

Authors:  Pia Bader; Dieter Echtle; Valerie Fonteyne; Kostas Livadas; Gert De Meerleer; Alvaro Paez Borda; Eleni G Papaioannou; Jan H Vranken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Cancer pain and depression: a systematic review of age-related patterns.

Authors:  Lucia Gagliese; Lynn R Gauthier; Gary Rodin
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Pain questionnaire performance in advanced prostate cancer: comparative results from two international clinical trials.

Authors:  Donald W Robinson; Ning Zhao; Fitzroy Dawkins; Ming Qi; Dennis Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  An examination of adherence to pain medication plans in older cancer patients in hospice care.

Authors:  Sara Sanders; Keela A Herr; Perry G Fine; Catherine Fiala; Xiongwen Tang; Chris Forcucci
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.