Literature DB >> 14622352

Clinical performance of non-contact tonometry by Reichert AT550 in glaucomatous patients.

J Jorge1, J M González-Méijome, J A Díaz-Rey, J B Almeida, P Ribeiro, M A Parafita.   

Abstract

Measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) by non-contact tonometry (NCT) has been demonstrated to be a valid and reliable technique to be used in primary eye care; it is easier to use, it does not transmit infectious diseases, and it is not necessary to use anaesthetic or staining eye drops. Recently, a new NCT device has showed an excellent level of agreement with Goldmann tonometry, but there are no records of its performance in glaucomatous eyes. To rectify this, IOP was measured in twenty-two patients (44 eyes) receiving medical treatment to control elevated IOP, with AT550 and Goldmann tonometry. Mean values of IOP were 18.98 +/- 2.77 and 19.08 +/- 3.02 mmHg using Goldmann and AT550, respectively. Plots of differences against means displayed good agreement (mean difference +/- limits of agreement, -0.09 +/- 3.30); this value was not significantly different from zero (t-test for dependent samples, p = 0.709). In conclusion, IOP values as measured with the AT550 NCT are clinically comparable with those obtained with Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous patients. This validates this NCT not only for screening of IOP but to follow-up glaucomatous patients with a rapid, non-invasive method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14622352     DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00139.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  9 in total

1.  A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Rebound tonometry: new opportunities and limitations of non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure.

Authors:  A Cervino
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Age differences in central and peripheral intraocular pressure using a rebound tonometer.

Authors:  J M González-Méijome; J Jorge; A Queirós; P Fernandes; R Montés-Micó; J B Almeida; M A Parafita
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Sarwat Salim; Daniel J Linn; James R Echols; Peter A Netland
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-02

6.  Performance of the PT100 noncontact tonometer in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Turki M AlMubrad
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-19

7.  Two-position measurement of intraocular pressure by PT100 noncontact tonometry in comparison with Goldmann tonometry.

Authors:  Kelechi C Ogbuehi; John C Chijuka; Uchechukwu L Osuagwu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-06

8.  Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement with Scheimpflug-based noncontact tonometer with and without hydrogel contact lenses.

Authors:  Mukesh Kumar; Rohit Shetty; Chaitra Jayadev; Debarun Dutta; Maneck D Nicolsan; Sriharsha Nagaraj; Rajesh S Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Effects of inhaled fluticasone on intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in asthmatic children without a family history of glaucoma.

Authors:  Muslim M Alsaadi; Uchechukwu L Osuagwu; Turki M Almubrad
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.