Literature DB >> 14622066

Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory.

Shane T Mueller1, Travis L Seymour, David E Kieras, David E Meyer.   

Abstract

The phonological-loop model provides a prominent theoretical description of verbal working memory. According to it, serial recall accuracy should be inversely related to the articulatory duration and phonological similarity of verbal items in memorized sequences. Initial tests of these predictions by A. D. Baddeley and colleagues (e.g., A. D. Baddeley, N. Thomson, & M. Buchanan, 1975) appeared to support the phonological-loop model, but subsequent researchers have obtained conflicting data that putatively disconfirm its assumptions. Such conflicts may have stemmed from less than ideal measurements of articulatory duration and phonological similarity. This article discusses these concerns and proposes new theoretically principled methods for measuring articulatory duration and phonological similarity. Two experiments that used these methods in the context of a verbal serial recall task are reported. The results of these experiments confirm and extend the predictions of the phonological-loop model while disarming previous criticisms of it. ((c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved)

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14622066     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  27 in total

1.  Short-term memory span: insights from sign language.

Authors:  Mrim Boutla; Ted Supalla; Elissa L Newport; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Conditional recall and the frequency effect in the serial recall task: an examination of item-to-item associativity.

Authors:  Leonie M Miller; Steven Roodenrys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

3.  Modulating the phonological similarity effect: the contribution of interlist similarity and lexicality.

Authors:  Paul Johan Karlsen; Arild Lian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

4.  Chunk limits and length limits in immediate recall: a reconciliation.

Authors:  Zhijian Chen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Ordered short-term memory differs in signers and speakers: implications for models of short-term memory.

Authors:  Daphne Bavelier; Elissa L Newport; Matt Hall; Ted Supalla; Mrim Boutla
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-02-20

6.  The effects of processing time and processing rate on forgetting in working memory: testing four models of the complex span paradigm.

Authors:  Annekatrin Hudjetz; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

7.  Individual differences in phonological learning and verbal STM span.

Authors:  Elisabet Service; Sini Maury; Emilia Luotoniemi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

8.  The roles of semantic similarity and proactive interference in the word length effect.

Authors:  Winston D Goh; Chang Khiang Goh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

9.  Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: Similar patterns of rehearsal and similar effects of word length, presentation rate, and articulatory suppression.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatarah; Geoff Ward; Jessica Smith; Louise Hayes
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-07

10.  The word-length effect provides no evidence for decay in short-term memory.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.