Literature DB >> 1462103

Chemotherapy for urothelial tract malignancies: breaking the deadlock.

H I Scher1, L Norton.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy treatments for urothelial tract tumors have improved to the point that some patients are enjoying long-term disease-free survival. Moreover, with currently available agents and combinations, and with our increased application of clinical and biologic prognostic factors, we are refining our ability to select appropriate therapies for individual patients. We have learned that once the decision is made to use combination chemotherapy, adequate doses should be used. This can be facilitated by the coadministration of hematopoeitic growth factors. Recently completed phase II trials have confirmed that higher doses and dose rates may increase response proportions of and in particular, the proportion of complete responses. The finding that granulocyte colony stimulating factor enhances the sensitivity of tumor cells to methotrexate in vitro and to other agents studied against urothelial tumors implanted in nude mice implies an expanded role for these compounds. However, because non-hematologic toxicities are still important, it is unlikely that simple escalation of all components a four drug regimen such as of M-VAC (cisplatin, methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin) will have a significant impact on survival. In addition, as more is learned about the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships of the active agents, it appears that better schedules can be designed to improve the therapeutic index of the compounds. Ultimately we will be able to determine drug sensitivities, both at the start of therapy and as it evolves during treatment, that will allow a better selection of a particular chemotherapeutic regimen. For example, mdr1 induction appears to play a significant role in the therapy for treatment-resistant tumors. The availability of a number of active salvage regimens that are not constrained by this mechanism hints that changes in drug sequencing and drug scheduling may provide a significant improvement in outcome. While established combination chemotherapy regimens should be considered standard therapy in appropriately selected patients, promising strategies and new agents need to be investigated if we are to "break the deadlock" that has appeared in the treatment of urothelial tumors. These investigations can be performed safely in a well-controlled fashion to enable the identification of new regimens and to compare promising strategies with appropriate control populations in randomized trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1462103     DOI: 10.1002/ssu.2980080511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1098-2388


  7 in total

1.  [Chemotherapy of bladder cancer. Systemic therapy with reduced toxicity].

Authors:  J E Gschwend; J Simon; B Volkmer; R E Hautmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Phase II trial of pyrazoloacridine as second-line therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  P M Dodd; J A McCaffrey; M Mazumdar; E Icasiano; G Higgins; H Herr; D F Bajorin
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 3.  The role of paclitaxel in chemosensitive urological malignancies: current strategies in bladder cancer and testicular germ-cell tumors.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; J T Hartmann; M A Kuczyk; M C Truss; J Beyer; U Jonas; L Kanz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Paclitaxel with cisplatin as salvage treatment for patients with previously treated advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract.

Authors:  Ji Eun Uhm; Ho Yeong Lim; Won Seog Kim; Han Yong Choi; Hyun Moo Lee; Byeong-Bae Park; Keunchil Park; Won Ki Kang
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  Phase II study of paclitaxel in pretreated patients with locally advanced/metastatic cancer of the bladder and ureter.

Authors:  D Papamichael; C J Gallagher; R T Oliver; P W Johnson; J Waxman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  The effect of dose intensity on M-VAC therapy for advanced urothelial cancer.

Authors:  N Miyanaga; H Akaza; T Shimazui; M Ohtani; K Koiso
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  VDAC1 as Pharmacological Target in Cancer and Neurodegeneration: Focus on Its Role in Apoptosis.

Authors:  Andrea Magrì; Simona Reina; Vito De Pinto
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 5.221

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.