OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of gray scale harmonic ultrasonography with a microbubble contrast agent in the early assessment of the therapeutic response to radio frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with 81 nodular hepatocellular carcinomas (1.3-4.8 cm) treated with percutaneous radio frequency ablation were evaluated with contrast-enhanced gray scale harmonic ultrasonography after intravenous bolus injection of a galactose-based microbubble contrast agent. The vascularity within the ablation zones was evaluated with a continuous scan for 3 to 5 seconds between 15 and 30 seconds after initiation of contrast agent injection. To evaluate the perfusion of the ablation zones, intermittent stimulated acoustic emission imaging was performed with a rapid sweeping technique from the end of the continuous scan. All patients underwent follow-up 3-phase helical computed tomography at 1 month after radio frequency ablation and were followed for at least 1 year. The results of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography were compared with those of follow-up computed tomography in terms of the presence or absence of residual unablated tumors. RESULTS: In 10 (12%) of the 81 treated hepatocellular carcinomas, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography showed either nodular or crescentic enhancing foci at the margins of ablation zones, suggesting residual unablated tumors. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography obtained 1 month after radio frequency ablation confirmed the residual unablated tumors in the same 10 lesions. Diagnostic agreement between 1-month follow-up computed tomography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was achieved in all 81 cases (100%). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced gray scale harmonic ultrasonography can be a reliable alternative to contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the early assessment of the therapeutic response to radio frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of gray scale harmonic ultrasonography with a microbubble contrast agent in the early assessment of the therapeutic response to radio frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with 81 nodular hepatocellular carcinomas (1.3-4.8 cm) treated with percutaneous radio frequency ablation were evaluated with contrast-enhanced gray scale harmonic ultrasonography after intravenous bolus injection of a galactose-based microbubble contrast agent. The vascularity within the ablation zones was evaluated with a continuous scan for 3 to 5 seconds between 15 and 30 seconds after initiation of contrast agent injection. To evaluate the perfusion of the ablation zones, intermittent stimulated acoustic emission imaging was performed with a rapid sweeping technique from the end of the continuous scan. All patients underwent follow-up 3-phase helical computed tomography at 1 month after radio frequency ablation and were followed for at least 1 year. The results of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography were compared with those of follow-up computed tomography in terms of the presence or absence of residual unablated tumors. RESULTS: In 10 (12%) of the 81 treated hepatocellular carcinomas, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography showed either nodular or crescentic enhancing foci at the margins of ablation zones, suggesting residual unablated tumors. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography obtained 1 month after radio frequency ablation confirmed the residual unablated tumors in the same 10 lesions. Diagnostic agreement between 1-month follow-up computed tomography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was achieved in all 81 cases (100%). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced gray scale harmonic ultrasonography can be a reliable alternative to contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the early assessment of the therapeutic response to radio frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Authors: Man Zhang; Benjamin Castaneda; Jared Christensen; Wael E Saad; Kevin Bylund; Kenneth Hoyt; John G Strang; Deborah J Rubens; Kevin J Parker Journal: Med Phys Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Brian J Fahey; Rendon C Nelson; Stephen J Hsu; David P Bradway; Douglas M Dumont; Gregg E Trahey Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 2.998