Literature DB >> 14620869

Critical response time (time available to implement effective measures for epidemic control): model building and evaluation.

A L Rivas1, S E Tennenbaum, J P Aparicio, A L Hoogesteijn, H O Mohammed, C Castillo-Chávez, S J Schwager.   

Abstract

The time available to implement successful control measures against epidemics was estimated. Critical response time (CRT), defined as the time interval within which the number of epidemic cases remains stationary (so that interventions implemented within CRT may be the most effective or least costly), was assessed during the early epidemic phase, when the number of cases grows linearly over time. The CRT was calculated from data of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) epidemic that occurred in Uruguay. Significant regional CRT differences (ranging from 1.4 to 2.7 days) were observed. The CRT may facilitate selection of control measures. For instance, a CRT equal to 3 days would support the selection of measures, such as stamping-out, implementable within 3 days, but rule out measures, such as post-outbreak vaccination, because intervention and immunity building require more than 3 days. Its use in rapidly disseminating diseases, such as FMD, may result in regionalized decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620869      PMCID: PMC280717     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  7 in total

1.  Managing foot-and-mouth.

Authors:  M Woolhouse; A Donaldson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The foot-and-mouth epidemic in Great Britain: pattern of spread and impact of interventions.

Authors:  N M Ferguson; C A Donnelly; R M Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The importance of immediate destruction in epidemics of foot and mouth disease.

Authors:  S C Howard; C A Donnelly
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.534

4.  Dynamics of the 2001 UK foot and mouth epidemic: stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape.

Authors:  M J Keeling; M E Woolhouse; D J Shaw; L Matthews; M Chase-Topping; D T Haydon; S J Cornell; J Kappey; J Wilesmith; B T Grenfell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain.

Authors:  N M Ferguson; C A Donnelly; R M Anderson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The analysis of equilibrium in malaria.

Authors:  G MACDONALD
Journal:  Trop Dis Bull       Date:  1952-09

7.  Failure of vaccination to prevent outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  M E Woolhouse; D T Haydon; A Pearson; R P Kitching
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.451

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Data-Driven Models of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Dynamics: A Review.

Authors:  L W Pomeroy; S Bansal; M Tildesley; K I Moreno-Torres; M Moritz; N Xiao; T E Carpenter; R B Garabed
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.005

2.  Connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.

Authors:  Ariel L Rivas; Folorunso O Fasina; Almira L Hoogesteyn; Steven N Konah; José L Febles; Douglas J Perkins; James M Hyman; Jeanne M Fair; James B Hittner; Steven D Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.