Literature DB >> 14620030

The effects of augmented kinematic feedback on motor skill learning in rifle shooting.

Kaisu Mononen1, Jukka T Viitasalo, Niilo Konttinen, Pertti Era.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the effects of augmented kinematic knowledge of performance (KP) on shooting performance and learning. Knowledge of performance described the aiming trajectory of the rifle barrel. The effects of knowledge of performance were evaluated in terms of shooting accuracy (shooting score), variability of the shooting score (root mean square error) and rifle stability (x- and y-deviation of rifle movement). The participants (n = 40) were randomly assigned to one of four groups: no-KP, 50% KP, 100% KP and a control group. The three experimental groups performed 480 shots during a 4 week acquisition phase in which feedback was provided. No-feedback retention tests were administered at 2 and 10 days after acquisition. There were no differences between groups during acquisition. In the 2 day retention test, the mean shooting score of the group receiving 100% knowledge of performance was significantly higher than that of the other groups. Furthermore, variability in shooting score for the 100% KP group was lower than that for the 50% KP and control groups. No significant differences were found in rifle stability between the experimental groups. In summary, a high frequency of kinematic knowledge of performance improved shooting accuracy, but the effect appeared to be temporal, disappearing in the 10 day retention test. Given that a parallel effect was not found in rifle stability, future research should focus on examining the reasons for this improvement in shooting score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620030     DOI: 10.1080/0264041031000101944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  5 in total

Review 1.  Harnessing and understanding feedback technology in applied settings.

Authors:  Elissa Phillips; Damian Farrow; Kevin Ball; Richard Helmer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The effects of interval feedback on the self-efficacy of netball umpires.

Authors:  Alison J Mahoney; Tracey Devonport; Andrew M Lane
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Transposing musical skill: sonification of movement as concurrent augmented feedback enhances learning in a bimanual task.

Authors:  John Dyer; Paul Stapleton; Matthew Rodger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-05-27

4.  The Associations Among Self-Compassion, Self-Esteem, Self-Criticism, and Concern Over Mistakes in Response to Biomechanical Feedback in Athletes.

Authors:  Yasamin Alipour Ataabadi; Danielle L Cormier; Kent C Kowalski; Alison R Oates; Leah J Ferguson; Joel L Lanovaz
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-19

5.  Maximizing Performance: Augmented Feedback, Focus of Attention, and/or Reward?

Authors:  Michael Wälchli; Jan Ruffieux; Yann Bourquin; Martin Keller; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.