Literature DB >> 14620025

Body image perception, satisfaction and somatotype in male and female athletes and non-athletes: results using a novel morphing technique.

Arthur D Stewart1, Philip J Benson, Evangelia G Michanikou, Dimitra G Tsiota, Margarita K Narli.   

Abstract

Thirty-six adults (24 males, 12 females) were assessed for anthropometric somatotype and body image (perception and satisfaction) by a novel technique using quantitative distortion of a digital still image. Software produced random distortions in nine body regions. The participants manipulated interactive slider controls to adjust each body feature in turn, recreate their perceived image and indicate their desired image. There were no differences in perception between the sexes. However, the ideal-actual differences (i.e. satisfaction) indicated that males desired larger and females smaller features, respectively, in the chest and thighs (P < 0.001) and arms and calves (P < 0.01). When the male-derived data were partitioned by sport (strength, endurance, team-sport and controls), differences were found in the perceived image size in the chest and rib regions (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). Strength athletes perceived these areas to be smaller and the control group perceived these areas to be larger than the true values. Somatotype analysis indicated that the physique associated with minimal dissatisfaction was 2.0-5.0-3.0 for males and 3.0-2.5-3.0 for females. Cluster analysis, combining anthropometric and satisfaction data, revealed seven distinct subgroups distinguished by particular attributes of physical appearance. We conclude that the method is reliable and that body image includes sex-specific, anthropometric, perceptual and personality-related components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620025     DOI: 10.1080/0264041031000140338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  5 in total

1.  Body image in women with HIV: a cross-sectional evaluation.

Authors:  Jeannie S Huang; Shawn Harrity; Daniel Lee; Karen Becerra; Rosanne Santos; W Christopher Mathews
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 2.250

2.  Evaluation of a prototype tool for communicating body perception disturbances in complex regional pain syndrome.

Authors:  Ailie J Turton; Mark Palmer; Sharon Grieve; Timothy P Moss; Jenny Lewis; Candida S McCabe
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  Body Dissatisfaction in Individuals with Obesity Compared to Normal-Weight Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Natascha-Alexandra Weinberger; Anette Kersting; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Claudia Luck-Sikorski
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.942

4.  Assessment of quality of life in HAART-treated HIV-positive subjects with body fat redistribution in Rwanda.

Authors:  Eugene Mutimura; Aimee Stewart; Nigel J Crowther
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 2.250

5.  Development and Validation of the Body Size Scale for Assessing Body Weight Perception in African Populations.

Authors:  Emmanuel Cohen; Jonathan Y Bernard; Amandine Ponty; Amadou Ndao; Norbert Amougou; Rihlat Saïd-Mohamed; Patrick Pasquet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.