Literature DB >> 1461960

Comparison of impedance cardiographic measurements using band and spot electrodes.

A Sherwood1, S A Royal, J S Hutcheson, J R Turner.   

Abstract

The comprehensive assessment of cardiac function using impedance cardiography has led to increasingly widespread use of the technique in psychophysiology. Disposable adhesive band electrodes have been the most widely used electrode type, but spot electrode configurations present attractive alternatives in terms of convenience and subject comfort. The present study was designed to evaluate whether one such spot electrode configuration yielded the same information as the more standard band electrodes for cardiac output and systolic time interval measurement. Male and female healthy adult subjects (N = 20) were tested. Comparisons between spot and band electrodes were made for the absolute magnitude of cardiac output and systolic time intervals, as well as for responses to the highly reproducible effects of bicycle exercise. Consistent with previous findings, systolic time interval measurements were unaffected by electrode type. However, for cardiac output measurements, differences between spot and band electrode measurements were found. Under resting conditions, the absolute magnitudes of cardiac output values measured using spot electrodes were smaller than for band electrodes. Subtle, yet significant differences were also found for cardiac output responses to exercise, with spot electrodes indicating greater increases in cardiac output than band electrodes. At the same time, anticipated gender differences found for cardiac output at rest and in response to exercise were unaffected by electrode type. Overall, these findings suggest that when comparing the results of studies that have utilized different impedance electrode types, it would be prudent to remain alert to the possibility of confounding influences.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1461960     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb02051.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  17 in total

1.  Optimalisation of the spot electrode array in impedance cardiography.

Authors:  H H Woltjer; B W Arntzen; H J Bogaard; P M de Vries
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Comparability of Spot Versus Band Electrodes for Impedance Cardiography.

Authors:  Jennifer J McGrath; William H O'Brien; Hilary J Hassinger; Purvi Shah
Journal:  J Psychophysiol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 1.333

3.  Measuring Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) Activity in Toddlers - Resting and Developmental Challenges.

Authors:  Nicole R Bush; Zoe K Caron; Katherine S Blackburn; Abbey Alkon
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  How to Improve Adolescent Stress Responses: Insights From Integrating Implicit Theories of Personality and Biopsychosocial Models.

Authors:  David S Yeager; Hae Yeon Lee; Jeremy P Jamieson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-06-20

5.  Parental history of hypertension and cardiovascular response to stress in Black and White men.

Authors:  S B Miller; J R Turner; A Sherwood; K A Brownley; A L Hinderliter; K C Light
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  1995

6.  The ability of active versus passive coping tasks to predict future blood pressure levels in normotensive men and women.

Authors:  S S Girdler; A L Hinderliter; K A Brownley; J R Turner; A Sherwood; K C Light
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  1996

7.  Toward a better noninvasive assessment of preejection period: A novel automatic algorithm for B-point detection and correction on thoracic impedance cardiogram.

Authors:  Mohamad Forouzanfar; Fiona C Baker; Massimiliano de Zambotti; Corey McCall; Laurent Giovangrandi; Gregory T A Kovacs
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Comparison between spot and band electrodes and between two equations for calculations of stroke volume by means of impedance cardiography.

Authors:  H H Woltjer; B J van der Meer; H J Bogaard; P M de Vries
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Circadian hemodynamics in men and women with high blood pressure: dipper vs. nondipper and racial differences.

Authors:  Andrew Sherwood; LaBarron K Hill; James A Blumenthal; Alan L Hinderliter
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Hostility and anger in: cardiovascular reactivity and recovery to mental arithmetic stress.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Vella; Bruce H Friedman
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.